Template:Did you know nominations/Heji Shin: Difference between revisions
←Created page with '{{subst:NewDYKnomination | article = Heji Shin | article2 = | status = new | hook = ... that photographer '''Heji Shin''' c...' |
Adding review |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> |
--> |
||
:*{{DYK checklist |
|||
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING :* --> |
|||
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is ---> |
|||
|newness = y |
|||
|length = y |
|||
|eligibilityother = y |
|||
|sourced = y |
|||
|neutral = y |
|||
|plagiarismfree = y |
|||
|policyother = y |
|||
|hookcited = y |
|||
|hookinterest = y |
|||
|hookother = |
|||
|qpq = y |
|||
|status = maybe |
|||
|comments = First of all, "Big Cocks" are great. Lots of Wikipedians are gonna love to see "Big Cocks", and want to hear more about "Big Cocks". And everyone is gonna love "angry cock energy". I can't speak for everyone, but I know that when I see "Big Cocks", I'm immediately interested. Earwig's tool gives a low score of 39.8%, and basically all of that is sourced quotations from the NYT article. I'm a little disappointed in there not being a picture of "Big Cocks", although it might be difficult to come up with a freely licensed photo of "Big Cocks". Another thing that seemed weird to me is that the whole article is under the "Early Life" section. Huh? I sure hope "Big Cocks" weren't part of her early life! It could do with a bit more breaking out into sections. There could also be some more cool stuff in the infobox (like what type of art she does, what she's best known for, etc). But I love this article, I love this hook, I love "Big Cocks", and I definitely look forward to seeing "Big Cocks" on the main page. |
|||
|sign = '''[[User:Jacob Gotts|jp]]'''×'''[[User talk:Jacob Gotts|g]]''' 03:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 03:12, 27 September 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Heji Shin
- ... that photographer Heji Shin created Big Cocks, a series of portraits of roosters that she admired for their "angry cock energy"? Source: "Two prints from the series, titled “Big Cocks,” recently appeared in a group show at Galerie Buchholz in Berlin. Roosters have long been associated with masculinity (though, in fact, they don’t have penises, Shin informs me); in an era in which violence tends to be systemic or “tactical,” she writes to me later, “the short-lived outbursts of angry cock energy look Hellenistic and virile.”" ([1])
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- Reviewed: My Lonesome Cowboy and Hiropon (sculpture)
Created by Gamaliel (talk). Self-nominated at 22:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
First of all, "Big Cocks" are great. Lots of Wikipedians are gonna love to see "Big Cocks", and want to hear more about "Big Cocks". And everyone is gonna love "angry cock energy". I can't speak for everyone, but I know that when I see "Big Cocks", I'm immediately interested. Earwig's tool gives a low score of 39.8%, and basically all of that is sourced quotations from the NYT article. I'm a little disappointed in there not being a picture of "Big Cocks", although it might be difficult to come up with a freely licensed photo of "Big Cocks". Another thing that seemed weird to me is that the whole article is under the "Early Life" section. Huh? I sure hope "Big Cocks" weren't part of her early life! It could do with a bit more breaking out into sections. There could also be some more cool stuff in the infobox (like what type of art she does, what she's best known for, etc). But I love this article, I love this hook, I love "Big Cocks", and I definitely look forward to seeing "Big Cocks" on the main page. jp×g 03:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)