Jump to content

Talk:Harlem (poem)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk19:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Langston Hughes's poems Mother to Son, Harlem, and The Negro Speaks of Rivers have been described as "anthems of black America"? Source: " “The Negro Speaks of Rivers,” “Mother to Son,” and “Harlem” are anthems of black America." Hughes, (James Mercer) Langston 2/1/1902--5/22/1967. (2018). In S. D. Hatch (Ed.), Encyclopedia of African-American writing: five centuries of contribution : trials & triumphs of writers, poets, publications and organizations (3rd ed.). Grey House Publishing.

Created by Eddie891 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]


The Negro Speaks of Rivers
  • 5x expansion from 12 February; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; one minor comment, there's something weird with the formatting of the Miller citation: it's formatted as a web-cite (with "accessed on") but appears to be an offline source, from the date this precedes your work on the article; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing from the accessible sources;
Harlem (poem)
  • New article created 10 February; well written and cited inline to reliable sources; spotcheck found no issues with overly close paraphrasing, quotations are appropriately attributed
Mother to Son
  • New article created 9 February; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I found no issues with overly close paraphrasing in a random spotcheck on sources and quotations are appropriately attributed
Hook
  • Is interesting enough for me, mentioned in all three articles; though if we are putting it in quotation marks on the main page it should be in quotation marks in the article; AGF on offline source (which looks reliable); three QPQs carried out

Looking good, just the quotation mark thing to clear up - Dumelow (talk) 08:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Dumelow, I've just removed that cite in "The Negro Speaks of Rivers", as I can verify it with the other one and I don't understand the formatting either. I've expanded the relevant sentence in each article so that it includes the quote. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 16:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]