User:Wizardman/2011 CCI sort
Appearance
Much like User:Moneytrees/2010 CCI sort, giving a short breakdown on the 2011 CCIs for coordination purposes.
- 1. Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Epeefleche Erledigt
- 2. Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Arilang1234 Erledigt
- 3. Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Ahmetyal Erledigt
- 4. Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/S710 Erledigt
- 5. Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Eurodog Erledigt
- 6. Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/24.57.81.185 Erledigt
- 7. Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Dawkeye Erledigt
- 8. Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/GVnayR Erledigt
- 9. Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Djflem Erledigt
- 10. Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20110727 Erledigt
- Copied from Websites, mostly foreign
- Blocked
- Difficulty: Hardest remaining. Over 1,000 articles to go through with primarily non-english sources at that. While the sites can be translated and copyvio can still be found that way, it's a lot of work for each one.
- Pdel? Yes. Indef blocked, offline/translated sources, would be almost impossible to fully determine whether a violation or not.
- Difficulty: Hardest remaining. Over 1,000 articles to go through with primarily non-english sources at that. While the sites can be translated and copyvio can still be found that way, it's a lot of work for each one.
- Copied from Websites
- Blocked
- Difficulty: Hard. There's a lot of film synopses which are ripe for copyvio, but a fair number of proper edits too. There's a large number of articles to clean, but it pales in comparison to the previous two.
- Pdel? No on regular edits, yes on plot summaries as that's where most of the violations were
- Difficulty: Hard. There's a lot of film synopses which are ripe for copyvio, but a fair number of proper edits too. There's a large number of articles to clean, but it pales in comparison to the previous two.
- Copied from Websites, books
- Blocked
- Difficulty: Hard. User showed a disregard for copyright, and he had no problem copying offline and online sources. Luckily there aren't too many large ones to deal with on this one
- Pdel? Yes. Indef blocked, a lot of confirmed copyvio in print sources.
- Difficulty: Hard. User showed a disregard for copyright, and he had no problem copying offline and online sources. Luckily there aren't too many large ones to deal with on this one
- Copied from Websites
- Blocked
- Difficulty: Hard. Another large CCI with some large articles, but thankfully one that is well-sourced, so we know where the violations will be coming from.
- Pdel? No, online sources so can be checked as normal and the vios seem pretty obvious.
- Difficulty: Hard. Another large CCI with some large articles, but thankfully one that is well-sourced, so we know where the violations will be coming from.
- Copied from Websites, books
- Blocked
- Difficulty: Very hard. Used offline sources primarily, and fairly large additions. They also literally violated copyright on copyright (probably, 71 diffs to go through to know for sure).
- Pdel? Yes. Indef blocked, offline sources of questionable reliability.
- Difficulty: Very hard. Used offline sources primarily, and fairly large additions. They also literally violated copyright on copyright (probably, 71 diffs to go through to know for sure).
- Copied from Websites, books
- Not blocked, unsure of contribs since.
- Difficulty: Very hard. The articles that are left not only use offline sources, but the diffs are massive (almost half are +5000).
- Pdel? Haven't edited enough to say for sure
- Difficulty: Very hard. The articles that are left not only use offline sources, but the diffs are massive (almost half are +5000).
- Copied from Websites, newspapers
- Blocked
- Difficulty: Very hard. This is a weird one because the user referenced everything, but many of the refs are behind a paywall. The good news is that he quoted stuff in the references. The bad news is that's the problem. The quotes are often longer than the articles and that's the main thing that needs removal (unless the source is PD). Why very hard then? There's over 4,000 articles and most of them are large quote additions.
- Pdel? Kind of. Since most of the edits are the "quote=" garbage it's easiest to just remove it at this point rather than trying to figure out if it's too much. The handful of prose additions that do exist just check how you normally would.
- Difficulty: Very hard. This is a weird one because the user referenced everything, but many of the refs are behind a paywall. The good news is that he quoted stuff in the references. The bad news is that's the problem. The quotes are often longer than the articles and that's the main thing that needs removal (unless the source is PD). Why very hard then? There's over 4,000 articles and most of them are large quote additions.