Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boet Fighter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boet Fighter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:GNG A a s i m 17:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. A a s i m 17:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just double checked and still fails WP:GNG, see this search page. A a s i m 17:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are a decent amount of reviews for the game. Seems like it is fairly popular considering it's from South Africa. Wouldn't be surprised if there more that's not popping up for me. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Bluedude588 (talk) 00:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Most of these are not reliable sources. TheDeviantPro (talk) 01:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per nom. Article lacks reliable sources to establish notability. TheDeviantPro (talk) 01:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Extensive coverage in reliable sources ([1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6], etc.). To coin a phrase^^^ Most of these are reliable sources ——Serial^# 12:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Critical Hit is explicitly listed as unreliable at VGRS. SACoronavirus doesn't have an obvious indicator of editorial oversight. South African might be reasonably reliable given their commitment to local editorial practices. IOL has no obvious oversight but looks reasonably reliable given the sources under the hood. Cape Town looks local. --Izno (talk) 21:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty meh for me. Not enthused by the quality of the sources offered. --Izno (talk) 21:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 100 Steam reviews suggests its pretty minor even before I look to see where the game's been reviewed, and the article is pretty atrociously formatted/sourced as it stands. --Prosperosity (talk) 11:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.