Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. 7–0 Manchester United F.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Anyone is free to create a redirect if they see it fit. ✗plicit 23:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool F.C. 7–0 Manchester United F.C.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of any lasting notability here. The result is big, but not exceptional - the only records broken were at club level. Coverage of this match is entirely routine. If notability is proved in a few years, no prejudice against recreating the article, but even two months after the game, there has been no suggestion that it will be remembered in the same way as (for example) Liverpool F.C. 4–3 Newcastle United F.C. (1996). – Pee Jay 10:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and England. Shellwood (talk) 10:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Would generally agree. It'll be listed on web pages and various other sites and be regurgitated each year - but exceptional result by and of itself isn't indicative of lasting notability any more than the previous highest score... which was? (to demonstrate a point) Koncorde (talk) 15:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was the reviewer of the article and I must admit I was tired when I reviewed this. I should not have accepted it.

Thanks, Wikieditor019 (If I do not respond, please visit my talk page) 16:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ULPS (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non more notable than any other regular season game. Results are fine in articles for each clubs seasons. WikiVirusC^(talk) 18:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Consider also redirecting to 2022–23 Premier League. Giant Snowman 22:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a record score, not an exceptional scoreline and no sources indicating lasting notability. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 12:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It's not even a Liverpool Premier League record; according to List of Liverpool F.C. records and statistics#Wins, that was 9-0, albeit against Bournemouth. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No lasting notability, not a record, so no need for this article to exist. NapHit (talk) 14:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a record, no lasting notability- it's not long after the match, and there's no continued coverage of it. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:17, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While 7–0 is certainly an unusual result in a Premier League match, it is not a record and there is very little more than WP:ROUTINE coverage. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 21:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry. It is plausible search term and it is mentioned at that article in its proper context, but I would agree that it is not notable enough to have its own article. Dunarc (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It was indeed a big scoreline, and not one seen in the Premier League every week, but no record was broken. There is no lasting notability. Fats40boy11 (talk) 20:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.