Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Senior

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Senior

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant in-depth coverage. Only statistical coverage and passing mentions. X (talk) 21:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, England, and Wales. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Okay start, but certainly not GNG yet, but to have faith it could goto draft space. Govvy (talk) 21:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - This page was nominated for deletion withinn hours of going live, and there was no attempt to discuss notability on the talk page prior to that. The nom. statement then says it lacks significant in depth coverage, and so it might be worth having a read of WP:DEMOLISH. Per that essay, not happy with deletion here. However there isn't any clear evidence that this person is notable. It may be WP:TOOSOON. All the same, if the page creator wants to continue working on the article in the belief they can demonstrate notability, I believe they should be allowed to do so (with the advice that they should concentrate on notability first to avoid wasting their time). The page isn't ready for mainspace, so draftify this one. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Drafify - not currently notable, but might be in future. Giant Snowman 19:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Drafify -pare above reasons. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 10:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.