Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton Díaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Milton Díaz

Non-notable, unverifiable, and unsourced. Only real claim to fame appears to be participation on post 9/11 committees. Fails WP:BIO. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 03:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no notability claimed, established or likely. Nuttah68 10:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Löschen I am not even sure from the article which hearing he participated in. Congressional, City council or "Free Speech Day" at the local YMCA. Montco 12:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment that is probably my fault; I did some work with the article before I decided it was better to ~~delete it~~ propose it for deletion. The previous (highly POV) statement did mention more thoroughly the nature and source of Mr. Díaz's comment. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 17:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no sources, no references and unverified citations. All this makes it necessary to delete a living persons bio Alf photoman 14:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vanity bio. Wile E. Heresiarch 18:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable as per nom.Veronica Mars fanatic 14:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. (jarbarf) 00:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.