Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuneScape slang and terminology
Tools
Actions
Allgemein
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Robert T | @ | C 01:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so it's been a long time since I spent time on VfD (ok.. AfD now), but please tell me that we haven't started considering this kind of fansite material encyclopedic. Isomorphic 04:19, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Better suited to a fan site. Some of these terms aren't specific to the game: botting, melee, and noob are common in online role-playing games. Still there's not enough substance here to merge into a broader MMORPG article. Durova
- Delete fancruft post haste. --DavidConrad 05:41, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Wikipedia is not GameFAQs nor Everything2. Does not appear in multiple contexts, so no need of explanation to a wider world. Geogre 13:44, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The things in this article which are useful to the RuneScape fans (villages, towns and so on) lie already in other articles. The rest are just conventions used by people playing it, and not really useful to anyone, fans or non-fans. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:14, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn-fancruft. - Pureblade | ☼ 21:12, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- DO NOT DELETE. Although it's not really helpful to anyone but new players, it's still helpful. Kariia 04:48, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I created the slang page to get it off of the main runescape page, i didnt like the article in the first place but i didnt wanted to make anyone mad.--Super Quinn 14:48, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not really needed,the voting is a pretty unamous decision. J.J.Sagnella 19:52, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems unnecessary ... -- Greaser 08:48, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fancruft. *drew 00:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.