Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shut Out the Moon
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shut Out the Moon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and song-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, United Kingdom, and England. UtherSRG (talk) 16:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, dxneo (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Not really much to find, cite 1 and cite 2 are dead links, fails WP:GNG and has no SIGCOV whatsoever. dxneo (talk) 17:14, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.