Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvester (Trapped In The Closet) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Trapped in the Closet. Again. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 22:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvester (Trapped In The Closet)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable fictional character. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as per the earlier AfD. The real question is why User:Affe97! is recreating previously AfD=merged articles. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per previous AfD. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:56, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
RE-redirect back to Trapped in the closet (as resulted in the earlier AFD). This non-notable fictional character might be mentioned in related articles, specially as the character is receiving some limited attention with announcement of Kelly's plans for an expansion of the Trapped in the Closet series. Lacking notability for a separate article we can at least send readers to where they might learn about the character in context to the film. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.