Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nautilus Middle School (0th nomination)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 4 July 2005 14:39 (UTC)

Nautilus Middle School

Doesn't seem like a notable school and has no good content. Seems like school articles have been debated a lot in the past, but I feel as if there needs to be more than one line to keep it. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 20:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, that one line is even POV. I urge school inclusionists to leave a link in a school project, let it be deleted and write a worthwhile stub/article in it's place later (or before the VFD ends if possible. You don't need this one line to write that great article. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:13, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
  • Change to keep, it's no longer a POV substub. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:29, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • But most people are far more likely to expand an existing article than to start a new one. Starting an article is a much higher hurdle, and most of the 307,000 registered users haven't jumped it, never mind the millions of unregistered readers. CalJW 21:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. If it's POV, edit it until it isn't POV. This is a Wiki. Using VfD to try to alter the content of POV articles is like using dynamite to deal with a toothache. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. The history reveals that this article seems to have been the target of repeated vandalism. It's alternated between POV and NPOV several times. Pburka 23:55, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Merge onto Miami-Dade County, Florida#Independent judiciary and school district — RJH 20:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep User:GRider/Schoolwatch (preceding unsigned comment by Klonimus 19:26, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC))
• Merge with the appropriate geographical article, to keep the school inclusionists happy. --Carnildo 20:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. That would not keep me happy. Merging an article is a form of deletion. It can no longer be categorised in the appropriate place. CalJW 21:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. In due course it will improve. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Schools are not inherently notable. --Xcali 21:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I have added more information to the article. Pburka 23:35, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep verifiable and NPOV schools. Nice work Pburka. DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:21, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep on the condition that I can add an article about my local Starbucks. — Phil Welch 03:29, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. NPOV, verifiable. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:19, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
• Keep in the current form. It had 34 edits today. This proves the point that schools will be improved if they are nominated here. Vegaswikian 06:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Kommentar Cleanup is not an appropriate reason to list a page for deletion. Either the subject is encyclopedic or it isn't. Pburka 12:47, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I agree. Please use {{cleanup-school}} or {{school-stub}}. DoubleBlue (Talk) 13:26, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. All schools are notable enough for a truly great encyclopaedia. —RaD Man (talk) 28 June 2005 07:46 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. Dunc|☺ 28 June 2005 23:12 (UTC)
• Keep Inherent notability. Unfocused 29 June 2005 00:28 (UTC)
• Keep. Inherent non-non-notability.--Centauri 29 June 2005 07:55 (UTC)
• keep please it is notable Yuckfoo 29 June 2005 19:25 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.