Page:The letters of John Hus.djvu/307: Difference between revisions
Billinghurst (talk | contribs) m →top: convert {{portal link}} upsets disabig tools |
SDrewthbot (talk | contribs) m →top: link update |
||
| Page body (to be transcluded): | Page body (to be transcluded): | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<section begin="s1" />{{fine block|The {{namespace link|following letter|Letter 79, To Barons Wenzel de Duba and John of Chlum|..}}, with its bitter sarcasms on [[Author:Sigismund|Sigismund]]’s faith, is rightly sent to Duba and [[Author:John of Chlum|Chlum]], the officials originally deputed by Sigismund to protect Hus, and see to the carrying out of the [[Safe conduct to John Huss|safe-conduct]]. We had already learned that Chlum had left the court ({{namespace link|p. 243|Letter 69, To his Friends in Constance#243|..}}). We now see that in reality he had been dismissed. His plain speech was not welcome to the faithless monarch. |
<section begin="s1" />{{fine block|The {{namespace link|following letter|Letter 79, To Barons Wenzel de Duba and John of Chlum|..}}, with its bitter sarcasms on [[Author:Sigismund|Sigismund]]’s faith, is rightly sent to Duba and [[Author:John of Chlum|Chlum]], the officials originally deputed by Sigismund to protect Hus, and see to the carrying out of the [[Safe conduct to John Huss|safe-conduct]]. We had already learned that Chlum had left the court ({{namespace link|p. 243|Letter 69, To his Friends in Constance#243|..}}). We now see that in reality he had been dismissed. His plain speech was not welcome to the faithless monarch. |
||
The letter is without date, and possibly should be put earlier in the month. The reference to Veit as well as to Sigismund’s advice at the Council would lead us to this. But if it be dated, with [[ |
The letter is without date, and possibly should be put earlier in the month. The reference to Veit as well as to Sigismund’s advice at the Council would lead us to this. But if it be dated, with [[Author:František Palacký|Palackẏ]], at the close of the month, the reader will note that up to the very end, though firm in the day, Hus had severe struggles with himself when chained alone at night in the darkness of his cell.}} |
||
<section end="s1" /> |
<section end="s1" /> |
||
{{dhr}} |
{{dhr}} |
||
Latest revision as of 10:45, 3 October 2023
The following letter, with its bitter sarcasms on Sigismund’s faith, is rightly sent to Duba and Chlum, the officials originally deputed by Sigismund to protect Hus, and see to the carrying out of the safe-conduct. We had already learned that Chlum had left the court (p. 243). We now see that in reality he had been dismissed. His plain speech was not welcome to the faithless monarch.
The letter is without date, and possibly should be put earlier in the month. The reference to Veit as well as to Sigismund’s advice at the Council would lead us to this. But if it be dated, with Palackẏ, at the close of the month, the reader will note that up to the very end, though firm in the day, Hus had severe struggles with himself when chained alone at night in the darkness of his cell.
LXXIX. To Barons Wenzel de Duba and John of Chlum
(Undated: ? middle or end of June)
Most gracious benefactors and guardians of the truth, I exhort you by the tender mercies of Jesus Christ to lay aside at once the vanities of this world and fight for the eternal King, even Christ the Lord. Put not your trust in princes, in the sons of men, in whom is no safety,[1] for to-day the sons of men are liars and deceivers, and to-morrow they will perish; but God abideth for ever. He hath servants not because He is in need of them, but for their own welfare. What He promises to them, He holds to; what He pledges himself to grant, He fulfils; He deceives no man by a safe-conduct and dismisses no faithful servant; for He saith: Where I am, there shall My servant be also.[2] Each of His servants He, their Master, maketh to be master of all that He hath,