Talk:Sopron
Latest comment: 18 days ago by Ground Zero in topic Which entries are relevant?
Which entries are relevant?
By WV:Relevant, historic buildings should only be included if they are of particular interest for a visitor. Which ones should be deleted? Which should be inserted to more generalized descriptions? /Yvwv (talk) 03:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- This article is quite long. Might it be a good idea to district this city, regardless of the fact that it's small in population? Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- I would support splitting this article up due to its sheer length, even its population is around 65k. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 06:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Most of the entries are private buildings which are not open to the public, do not have organized hospitality, are not likely main attractions for visitors, and are not otherwise relevant for listing by Wikivoyage:Listings#Historic_buildings,_sites_and_natural_formations. One solution would be to create an a travel topic named architecture of Sopron with listings useful to a visitor; compare articles such as Stockholm quay palace tour. /Yvwv (talk) 13:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yvwv's solution makes the most sense to me. Ground Zero (talk) 13:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Most of the entries are private buildings which are not open to the public, do not have organized hospitality, are not likely main attractions for visitors, and are not otherwise relevant for listing by Wikivoyage:Listings#Historic_buildings,_sites_and_natural_formations. One solution would be to create an a travel topic named architecture of Sopron with listings useful to a visitor; compare articles such as Stockholm quay palace tour. /Yvwv (talk) 13:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- I would support splitting this article up due to its sheer length, even its population is around 65k. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 06:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)