Aller au contenu

« John Milton » : différence entre les versions

Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre.
Contenu supprimé Contenu ajouté
Bernard Botturi (discuter | contributions)
réorganisation
Balises : Révoqué Ajout d'adresse électronique
Ligne 138 : Ligne 138 :
=== John Milton et la liberté de publier ===
=== John Milton et la liberté de publier ===
John Milton fait partie des premiers partisans de la liberté de la presse dans le royaume britannique au {{s-|XVII|e}}<ref>[[Yves Charles Zarka]], ''Monarchie et république au {{s-|XVII|e}}'', PUF.</ref>, et il est aussi considéré comme un des précurseurs du [[libéralisme]]<ref>[[Pierre Manent]], ''Les Libéraux'' (1986, rééd. Gallimard, 2001).</ref>. Il a écrit un manifeste intitulé ''Pour la liberté d’imprimer sans autorisation ni censure'' (''[[Areopagitica]]''), où il exprime ses premières distances avec le gouvernement en vigueur.
John Milton fait partie des premiers partisans de la liberté de la presse dans le royaume britannique au {{s-|XVII|e}}<ref>[[Yves Charles Zarka]], ''Monarchie et république au {{s-|XVII|e}}'', PUF.</ref>, et il est aussi considéré comme un des précurseurs du [[libéralisme]]<ref>[[Pierre Manent]], ''Les Libéraux'' (1986, rééd. Gallimard, 2001).</ref>. Il a écrit un manifeste intitulé ''Pour la liberté d’imprimer sans autorisation ni censure'' (''[[Areopagitica]]''), où il exprime ses premières distances avec le gouvernement en vigueur.
A SACRED TEXT OF THE DARK CHURCH OF SATAN
𝕺𝖘𝖈𝖚𝖗𝖆 𝕮𝖍𝖎𝖊𝖘𝖆 𝖉𝖎 𝕾𝖆𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖆
OF 𝕬𝖓𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑 𝕳𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍 : THE LOST PARADISE OF JOHN MILTON First edition (1667)

THE LOST PARADISE
BY JOHN MILTON

Translated by Mr.

PAOLO ROLLI WITH ANNOTATIONS

BY G. ADDISON

And some critical observations..

VENICE MDCCXCIV

AT ANDREA SANTINI With License of Superiors.

«Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven.»
(John Milton, Paradise Lost, Libro I)

Dark Church of Satan
URL: https://oscurachiesadisatan.wixsite.com/website

The Dark Church of Satan was founded in on March 11, 2020 by 𝕬𝖓𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑 𝕳𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍 (Anna Daniele) and Luca Shaytan (Gian-Luca Aglioti), together with a new generation Italian Satanist community made up of researchers who, with in his own words, intends to place himself "outside the box, which breaks the ways of keyboard Satanists and challenges the pitfalls of the real world".
𝕬𝖓𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑 𝕳𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍, born in Scafati (Salerno) on 1 December 1998, is an occult researcher who has managed the YouTube channel Oscura Mente since 2018 . Luca Shaytan, born in Clermont-Ferrand (France) on March 11, 1975, made his first appearance on the Dark Mind page in 2019, laying the foundations of “true Satanism” eventually presented in the Dark Church of Satan.

After an analysis that led them to verify how many virtual groups and past initiatives have been archived or concluded, the founders therefore took into consideration the initiative of opening a point of reference for those Satanists, who - as part of a project marked by spaces for discussion and dialogue open to every possibility - intend to re-evaluate what they consider to be "true Satanism", that is, a "path of evolutionary growth faced from the beginning of our project, not accepting for any reason sectarian orders ('acidism ', crime, violence, sacrifices)”.

Operationally, the Dark Church of Satan was born with the intention of offering informative dissemination in the form of video lessons, articles, interactive live broadcasts and other similar methods of communication. The main intent is to create a meeting space, which makes it possible to create events and gatherings. The group – which gave itself the motto: “for Satan, in Satan, with Satan!” – accepts all currents of Italian Satanism and the “left hand path”, in support of all occult paths.

There are about twenty adherents of the Dark Church of Satan, mainly in the province of Salerno, and they follow various currents, from spiritualism, to rationalism, to theism, and more. Most members believe that demons are entities that can be worked with in ritualistics. For many of them, Satan is a sentient, powerful energy and a spiritual and symbolic deity. Magical, occult and Satanist ritual merges with alchemical transformation, conceived as "from lead to philosopher's gold". An important symbol for this culture is the cup, the chalice with the appearance of Baphomet; this symbolizes, in the words of the founders, drawing from “infinite satanic wisdom”.

B.: 𝕬𝖓𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑 𝕳𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍, Other Identity. A guide to unknown realities , Anguana Edizioni, Sossano (Vicenza) 2020.

Among the hundreds of millions of texts we have written, some stand alone in their resistance, in the extent to which they have survived attempts at cultural extermination, in the extent to which individuals have given everything for their preservation. Such texts are often the first from a given culture to be translated into other languages. They are expressions of a unifying substratum of experience that Rumi, Teresa of Avila, Hildegard of Bingen, and myriad other mystics (including even scientific rationalists such as Carl Sagan and Sam Harris) have written about from the perspective of multitudes of human cultures . These are among the qualities that might define the texts as sacred.

These texts have a huge impact on the daily life of every human being. Communities have formed around them everywhere. Laws are made, laws that affect both adherents and non-adherents, on the basis of what is said in these texts and their interpretations. People kill other people because of these texts, all over the world, every day. It is inevitable that we should take certain texts as sacred - I don't think there is anyone who would argue that we do not venerate or at least hold so important any text for whatever reason - but we should evaluate them very cautiously and never hold them beyond a doubt. Nor should we limit ourselves to the point of view of one particular canon or another.

My question is: Should Paradise Lost, John Milton's 17th century epic poem about Satan's fall from heaven, be considered a sacred text, especially as the Satanist is concerned?

Popular opinion is that the texts could be considered sacred because of their metaphysical content, their statements about reality, especially regarding theology and cosmology. But there are many recent texts of this nature which are pure rubbish and which I am sure will disappear in the next few centuries (as does a great deal of New Age nonsense such as

And it was called Two Hearts (Mutant Message Down Under) and Celestine's prophecy. And there are others that explicate cosmologies without giving them any aspect of reverence or spiritual expression, such as Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica.

Although this is an assumption arising from a particularly Western way of looking at religion, it is typically assumed that a sacred text must claim to have been created or inspired by God, as the Bible and the Quran are claimed to be. In fact, Milton himself believed that his text had been divinely inspired: the text begins with an invocation to Heaven to inspire him to write as the prophets had done:

Of man's first disobedience, and of the fruit

of that forbidden tree whose deadly taste

brought death to the world, and all our sorrows,

with the loss of Eden, until a greater man

may he restore us and regain the blessed seat,

sing, celestial muse, who is on the secret summit

of Horeb, or of Sinai, you inspired

that shepherd who first taught the chosen seed

In the beginning like the heavens and the earth

arose from the chaos...

I:1-10

To what extent do we now more commonly see Satan in his manifestation as the Adversary, who was cast out of Heaven with a third of the host of angels after raising a rebellion against God? This scenario is only hinted at in a few verses in a chapter of a book of the Bible that was almost left on the cutting room floor (Revelation 12:9), in contrast to several instances where Satan appears as the Accuser in foundational texts (the accuser is the most biblically traditional notion of Satan, the divine being who serves as God's proxy in heaven). And to what extent are names like Mammon, Belial, Beelzebub and others known to the general public as names of demons? Few of them are mentioned in the Bible, none for long, and none to a degree that would be featured in Paradise Lost, a very popular narrative in which all of these are major characters.

The narrative that defines Satan as the Serpent in the Garden of Eden, who tempted Eve to eat the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, is at best a dubious aspect of the original story as told in the second creation narrative in the biblical book of Genesis. Nowhere in the Bible is the Serpent of Genesis directly equated with Satan; only two passages in the Book of Revelation (12:9 and 20:2) link Satan to serpents in any way, but there is no mention of Satan as the particular serpent of the Garden of Eden. Yet this conception of Satan as the Serpent of Genesis is the popular one, and it was Paradise Lost in which that conception was codified.

Thus, even through contrasting philosophies, Paradise Lost appears as a central text in the correlation of our religious experiences. Old and blind, Milton dictated this work to his scribes, and it has been passed down to us for nearly four centuries, inspiring both scholarship and art throughout. In this, the text clearly meets the criteria of preservation and relevance, and the preceding passages indicate that it also meets the criterion of divinity, or at least a claim to it.

The text is certainly of great spiritual significance to the Luciferian, Luciferianism being the satanic religion or philosophy that venerates Satan the Adversary as an inspiring icon of liberation, rebellion and knowledge. Milton was a Christian but he knew that he would be dishonest if he portrayed Satan without the measure of respect he owed him, and the noble characteristics thus expressed, which are nowhere mentioned in the Bible, are the keystone of Luciferian thought .

As an example of this, take this passage in the text, which occurs after Satan has been cast out of Heaven and finds himself and his host in the desolate, fiery wastes of Hell. Satan says to Beelzebub:

All is not lost - the invincible will,

And the study of revenge, immortal hatred,

And the courage to never submit or give in:

And what else is not to be won.

That glory not

neither his wrath nor his power will ever extort from me. Bow and ask for grace

With pleading knee, and deify his power

that, from the terror of this arm, so late

he doubted his empire, which was indeed low;

That was an ignominy and a shame underneath

this fall; since, by fate, the strength of the Gods,

and this Empyrean substance cannot fail;

Since from experience of this great event,

in no worse weapons, in very advanced foresight,

we can with happier hope resolve it

Wage war by force or cunning eternal war,

irreconcilable with our great enemy,

who now triumphs, and in excess of joy

sole ruler holds the tyranny of heaven.

I:106-124

This willful defiance of fate in the face of torment and despair is admirable, iconic and worthy of veneration. Satan has been brutally defeated, yet he is here even in the first verses of the text as triumphant. “That glory can never be extorted by the wrath of him or of me.” Satan could have just rebelled against God. If you take some theologies at their word, it was their will in the first place. But even an omnipotent God could not take from Satan and their army "vengeance, immortal hatred, and courage never to submit or yield." God as much as he admits to this, saying, seeing Satan's escape from Hell: “Do you see what anger our Adversary carries? which no prescribed limit, no bar of Hell, nor all the chains therein heaped upon him, nor yet the wide gap of the Abyss, can contain” (III:80-84).

Some may see revenge and hatred as ignoble virtues, but I think they are virtues that, given the appropriate goals, should resonate with anyone who possesses even a modicum of moral character. Against whom do I want revenge? The Catholic Church, for making religion a doctrine and screwing over children and covering it up. For whom do I have immortal hatred? Islamists who turn Rumi's realizations of God into reasons to kill the innocent. And in Satan, I have the courage not to submit or give in to the conceptions of God held by such.

I think Paradise Lost may be a superior moral example to much of the Bible. Which text outlines the permissible circumstances in which one can, with full divine sanction, sell one's daughter into sexual slavery? If the notion of Paradise Lost as a sacred text were to somehow gain wider acceptance, I cannot say with certainty that it would not or could not be interpreted in such a way as to justify oppressive laws or deplorable behavior. The human capacity to make excuses for evil seems boundless. But at least, I don't think Paradise Lost gives us a greater reason for this than the Bible, and while the Bible offers considerable wisdom, it also contains atrocities found nowhere in Milton's text.

What else about Paradise Lost could be worthy of veneration?

When Satan is looking for an exit from hell, he encounters sin and death, which God has placed to guard the gate of hell. At first they bar Satan's way, but then Satan offers that his adventure beyond the gates will lead him to a place "where [sin] and death will dwell at ease, and up and down in silence the prosperous air, embalmed with odors. There you will be nourished and satisfied immeasurably; everything will be your prey." Death replies:

The key to this hell pit, for debt

And by command of the almighty King of Heaven,

I keep, forbidden by Him to open

These adamantine doors: against every force there

Ready death is about to interpose his dart,

without fear of being overwhelmed by living could.

But what I owe to His commandments above,

who hates me and threw me down here

in this darkness of deep Tartarus,

to sit in hateful office confined here,

inhabitant of heaven and born celestial -

here in perpetual agony and pain,

with terrors and with clamors surrounded by

my own race, which feeds on my entrails?

You are my father, although my author, although the

my being gave me; Who should I obey?

But you? who follows? You will take me soon

to that new world of light and bliss, between

the gods living at ease, where

I will reign at your right voluptuous, as befits

your daughter and your darling, without end.

II:850-870

Death, like Satan, was created by God, but cast into torment simply for being of the same nature as him. It is not surprising, then, that Satan may seem to be a more suitable luminary. Likewise, many have been expelled from the hegemony of the Christian world simply for being who they are, or for reasons such as daring to challenge the authority of the Church.

And while Satan's host of fallen angels debate the way forward, his companion Belial advises him:

How tiring it is

eternity thus spent in paid adoration

who we hate! We therefore do not pursue,

by force impossible, by license obtained

our state is unacceptable, although in Heaven

of splendid vassalage; but rather we seek the

our good from ourselves, and from our own

life to ourselves, though in this vast recess,

free and to no one responsible, preferring the

hard freedom to an easy yoke

of the servile pump.

II:239-257

Those who accept the theology of the apostle Paul and the notion of damnation for those who do not accept the gift of Jesus' sacrifice for the sins of humanity must also reconcile themselves to the fact that they have sold their souls to a petty tyrant and that the Their devotion ultimately does not stem from true love for God, which would never have felt this way if not for fear of Hell, but only as a kind of Stockholm syndrome.

In considering Paradise Lost as a sacred text, one might argue that the texts of the Abrahamic tradition have already been canonized. But this view must necessarily assume that the canonized texts, at some point in our history, arose fully formed and accepted as doctrine. This is not the case at all. Taking the New Testament as an example, we now have in it a collection of four gospels (accounts of the life and sayings of Jesus), the book of Acts (which reports the story of some of the first apostles of the Church), 21 letters written by various Church Fathers (or counterfeits in their names) expounding various aspects of Church doctrine and an eschatological Apocalypse. But these are only 27 of what may have been hundreds of similar texts, some lost and some still extant, including other gospels, other stories, other letters (forged and authentic), and other apocalypses, all of which existed in a multitude of different versions . The now-canonical texts were written, selected, compiled, edited, and revised over the centuries, with changes made to the Catholic canon as recently as 1870.

I think that a dead canon - one to which nothing can be added, one that does not inspire new revelations like its foundational texts, one that admits of no degree of change or progress - means a dead religion. Paradise Lost has undoubtedly contributed to the Abrahamic religious tradition, more than the Bible in some particular aspects. Why then consider the Bible alone as privileged?

One might argue that Paradise Lost is a work of epic poetry, a genre hardly appropriate for a sacred text. The Odyssey is a revered work, but is it a sacred text? It may well be, but I don't think it's widely perceived as such. The Old Testament contains poetry, but it is all devotional rather than narrative. But the Hindu tradition includes the Mahabharata, the longest epic ever written, within its vast canon, and among its many books and chapters includes the Bhagavad Gita, which, although not as authoritative as the Vedas or Upanishad, is perhaps most widely known and loved by ordinary Hindus as a sacred text.

Why should the Satanist care about Paradise Lost as a sacred text? After all, the Bible (in which Paradise Lost is rooted) is held sacred by a substantial portion of the Hegemon, the cultural authority collective I have described elsewhere that includes institutions such as the Catholic Church and the United States government, to which they are and to which I believe any Satanist should be opposed to. I am confident that my writings thus far have proven convincing that, if we are to assume that these are their sacred texts, those of the Hegemon seem remarkably uninterested in what the texts actually say. Clearly these texts have power; if they can be used by those who have the power to maintain or assert power, regardless of any distortion or corruption of the texts themselves, I think they probably will, and history shows that they have done so on every occasion. Given such appropriation, it seems rational to abandon the lyrics altogether, but I think that would be a mistake. These historical texts connect our shared mystical experiences; having thus been the product of culture on the largest possible scales, they provide a correlation with something we regularly experience but cannot express in discursive language. I think it is nobler – and more satanic – to snatch them from those who have appropriated them rather than passively hand them over.

It is not my job or intention to tell anyone, especially other Satanists, what texts they should consider sacred, but for those of any background who are looking to escape the yoke of doctrine and build religion for themselves, Paradise Lost is a great place start. It is a beautiful and inspiring work of literature with strong and inspiring values that have stood and will continue to stand the test of time.

I haven't read many books on SATANISM, for me this book represents a literal masterpiece, a book that opens your eyes, unlike other satanic books passed off as cheap bibles!!!

𝕬𝖓𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑 𝕳𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍


== Œuvres de Milton ==
== Œuvres de Milton ==

Version du 22 janvier 2024 à 15:48

John Milton
Description de cette image, également commentée ci-après
John Milton vers 1629.
Naissance
Londres, Angleterre
Décès (à 65 ans)
Londres, Angleterre
Activité principale
Auteur
Langue d’écriture Anglais, Latin, Français, Allemand, Grec, Hébreu, Italien, Espagnol, Araméen, Syriaque

Œuvres principales

Signature de John Milton

John Milton (1608 - 1674) est un poète et un pamphlétaire anglais, célèbre pour être, en particulier, l’auteur de plusieurs poèmes épiques, Le Paradis perdu, Le Paradis retrouvé et Samson Agonistes, et aussi de sonnets.

Né en 1608 à Londres, alors dans le Royaume d'Angleterre, il fréquente de prestigieux établissements, St Paul's à Londres et Christ's College à Cambridge. Cependant, son désaccord avec son tutor (« directeur d'études ») rend son éducation, dans un premier temps, tumultueuse. À bien des égards, cependant, c'est un autodidacte qui ne cesse d'étudier et approfondir ses connaissances en langues anciennes et modernes, philosophie, littérature et théologie.

Après la victoire puritaine du Commonwealth de l'Angleterre, il est nommé secrétaire d'État aux Langues étrangères, poste qui le conduit à représenter le nouveau régime auprès de l'étranger. Il publie de nombreux pamphlets et traités en latin ou en anglais. Sa vue baisse inexorablement et, à l'âge de 40 ans, il est complètement aveugle. Il reçoit alors l'aide d'assistants, en particulier celle du poète Andrew Marvell.

Lors de la Restauration Stuart, il est arrêté et emprisonné à la tour de Londres pendant quelques semaines, mais se voit assez rapidement libéré. Il se consacre alors à l'écriture de ses longs poèmes épiques, d'une Histoire de l'Angleterre et aussi de sonnets plus intimes, dont le célèbre On His Blindness (« Sur sa cécité »).

Il meurt le . Il est considéré comme l'un des géants de la poésie anglaise.

Biographie

Jeunesse

Le père de John Milton est le compositeur John Milton, notaire puritain qui écrit des madrigaux pour la reine Élisabeth Ire. Il s’installe à Londres aux alentours de 1583, pour avoir caché son protestantisme car son propre père, Richard Milton, riche propriétaire du comté d’Oxford et dévot catholique, l’a déshérité. Vers 1600, le père du poète épouse Sara Jeffrey et John Milton naît le à Cheapside, Londres.

John Milton commence à écrire dès l’âge de dix ans. Puis, il commence ses études à l'école Saint-Paul de Londres. À cette époque, Milton se destine au ministère du culte anglican et pour cela, il se montre très assidu dans ses études. Il est admis le au Christ’s College de Cambridge. Cette période à Cambridge, de 1625 à 1632, est plutôt tumultueuse. Il s'avère en profond désaccord avec son directeur d’étude William Chappel, peut-être pour avoir été fouetté par lui. Milton est temporairement révoqué (« rusticated ») durant un trimestre, de janvier à mars 1626. À son retour, le , il se voit attribuer un nouveau directeur d’études qu’il garde jusqu’à la fin de ses années d’université. Il obtient son diplôme « cum laude », c'est-à-dire avec les félicitations du jury, le . Durant cette période, Milton écrit plusieurs poèmes en latin et des lettres en prose, et donne des cours d’hébreu au théologien américain Roger Williams en échange de cours de néerlandais.

Manifestement, les expériences de Milton à Cambridge n’ont pas été particulièrement fructueuses et ont contribué pour une bonne part à ses vues sur l’éducation. Après l’obtention de son diplôme, John Milton va vivre pendant six ans, de 1632 à 1638, dans la maison de ses parents à Hammersmith, puis à Horton dans une retraite studieuse. Il approfondit ses connaissances en grec et en latin, mais aussi en hébreu, en français, en espagnol, en italien et en vieil anglais, et dans des disciplines anciennes ou modernes comme la théologie, la philosophie, l’histoire, la politique, les lettres, la science, pour préparer sa future carrière de poète. Il acquiert ainsi une formidable érudition et rédige plusieurs œuvres importantes en prose comme en poésie. Il publie son premier poème en 1632. C’est durant cette période que Milton va progressivement abandonner son projet de prêtrise et que s'affirme sa vocation de poète.

Après la mort de sa mère en , Milton envisage, comme il est alors d’usage chez les jeunes gens de bonne famille, de partir en voyage sur le continent, en Frankreich et en Italie, puis de retourner à Londres pour continuer ses études et donner des cours privés. Il embarque donc pour la France au début de l’année 1638, passe par Paris et Nice, puis arrive en Italie où il visite de nombreuses villes, Gênes, Pise, Florence, Sienne, Rome, Naples, Venise, etc. Il rencontre nombre de personnalités célèbres et d'influence, dont le cardinal Francesco Barberini, mais aussi l’astronome Galilée dont la condamnation renforce l’attachement que Milton porte aux libertés religieuses de son pays. Milton, informé des prémices de la guerre civile qui gronde en Grande-Bretagne, se décide à rentrer en passant d’abord par Genève.

Milton pamphlétaire

À son retour, Milton devient le professeur privé de ses neveux mais aussi de plusieurs enfants de la haute noblesse. Il écrit d’ailleurs un traité sur l’éducation en 1644. Parallèlement à cette activité, immergé dans la controverse religieuse, il rédige cinq pamphlets contre la hiérarchie de l’Église[1]qui le font connaître et attirent sur lui l’ire des défenseurs du clergé.

En mai ou en juin 1642, John Milton se marie avec Mary Powell dont le père est débiteur de John Milton senior. La différence d’âge (16 et 33 ans), le caractère sévère et introverti de Milton, les opinions royalistes de la famille Powell sont autant de facteurs qui peuvent expliquer la fuite de Mary après seulement un mois de mariage. Celle-ci profite, en effet, d’une visite chez ses parents pour ne plus revenir au domicile conjugal. Milton va alors écrire The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce (« La doctrine et la discipline du divorce ») où il défend la légalisation et la moralité du divorce, ce qui lui attire les foudres de nombre de ses contemporains (la loi anglaise sur le mariage, inchangée ou presque depuis le Moyen Âge catholique, n’acceptant que la nullité du mariage pour stérilité). Face à la virulence de ses détracteurs et contre la censure qui s’applique à ses pamphlets, il écrit Areopagitica: A speech of Mr John Milton for the liberty of unlicensed printing to the Parliament of England (« Aeropagitica : discours de M. John Milton au Parlement de l’Angleterre pour la liberté de libre publication »)[N 1] qui s’attaque à une loi autorisant la censure instituée un an plus tôt[N 2],[2]. Mary et John se réconcilient en 1645 et la famille Powell emménage tout entière chez le couple. Mary donne le jour à quatre enfants : Anne, Mary, John (mort à l'âge de 15 mois) et Deborah. Malgré leur première séparation, l'entente semble avoir régné dans la famille. Mary, cependant, décède prématurément à l'âge de 26 ans en 1652. C’est à cette même époque qu’apparaissent chez Milton les premiers signes d’une faiblesse oculaire due sans doute à un glaucome qui le rendra progressivement aveugle.

Commonwealth

La victoire parlementaire et le procès du roi Charles Ier à la fin de l’année 1648 et au début de l’année 1649 donnent à Milton l’espoir de voir émerger une plus grande liberté. Il apporte son soutien à un régime parlementaire et argumente en défaveur du roi dans The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates (« Le mandat des rois et des magistrats »). Cette œuvre en prose ne prône pas ouvertement le régicide mais le soutient implicitement. Sa réputation politique et son érudition le font connaître du Parlement qui le nomme, le , secrétaire d’État aux Langues étrangères. Il est chargé des relations épistolaires avec les puissances étrangères et du compte-rendu des communications relatives à ce ministère au Parlement. Plus tard, il est également conduit à exercer des fonctions de censeur.

Son poste est important dans la mesure où la jeune république tient à se faire reconnaître diplomatiquement en Europe. Milton a aussi la charge de rédiger des ouvrages de propagande en faveur du régime. Le premier écrit sur commande est Eikonoklastes de 1649[3],[4] qui répond à un ouvrage en faveur du roi, Eikon Basilike, dont la popularité croissante inquiète le Conseil d’État. Une autre commande, Pro Populo Anglicano Defensio (« Pour la défense du peuple anglais »), écrite en 1651, est rédigée en réponse à l’ouvrage de Claude Saumaise publié par la famille royale en exil, Defensio regia pro carolo I. Ces ouvrages déclenchent de nombreuses réactions en Europe et les défenseurs de la maison des Stuart n’hésitent pas à affirmer que la cécité qui touche Milton est une punition divine due à ses prises de position et à son mode de vie dissolu.

Au moment du massacre des paysans vaudois protestants du Piémont, les Pâques vaudoises de 1655, lorsque Oliver Cromwell décrète un jeûne national en l’honneur des martyrs et envoie son ambassadeur Samuel Morland, John Milton écrit son sonnet sur Bloody Easter (« venge, ô Dieu, tes élus massacrés »), pour prendre la défense des paysans vaudois massacrés par les troupes du marquis de Pianezza, ce qui incite le jeune duc Charles-Emmanuel II de Savoie à leur accorder des « patentes de grâce » et un pardon général.

Sa cécité le contraint à progressivement diminuer son activité et l’importance de son poste s'en trouve réduite. Pour l'aider dans ses travaux, il bénéficie désormais d’assistants dont le jeune poète Andrew Marvell. John Milton reste en poste jusqu’à la fin de l’année 1659, après la mort d’Oliver Cromwell et la démission de son fils Richard. Face à la dégradation de la situation politique et à l’émergence d’une tendance au retour à la monarchie, il écrit plusieurs ouvrages pour défendre la cause de la liberté et dénoncer les dangers d’un État religieux.

Restauration

À la Restauration, malgré l’autodafé que subissent ses livres, Milton n’est, dans un premier temps, pas inquiété. En octobre 1660, cependant, il est arrêté et emprisonné à la tour de Londres où il reste jusqu’au 15 décembre. Ses amis, dont Andrew Marvell, alors membre du Parlement, sont intervenus pour obtenir sa libération.

Sa seconde femme, Katherine Woodcock, épousée en 1656, et leur fille meurent toutes deux au début de l’année 1658. Milton vit alors seul avec les trois filles de son premier mariage jusqu’en février 1663 où il se marie avec Élisabeth Minshull. En 1662, son notaire ayant fait faillite, il perd tous ses biens. Milton va vivre ses dernières années dans un certain dénuement, consacrant son temps à une retraite vouée à l’étude, à la dévotion et à la rédaction de ses œuvres les plus célèbres. Milton voit sa santé s'altérer mais reste intellectuellement actif. Il reçoit encore la visite de divers dignitaires étrangers, d’amis et de connaissances, mais ces rencontres s’espacent de plus en plus. Il se fait faire la lecture et dicte ses œuvres à ses assistants dont ses deux plus jeunes filles, Mary et Deborah.

Son chef-d’œuvre, le poème épique Paradise Lost, est publié en 1667 mais ne rencontre pas immédiatement le succès ; il faut attendre 1688, une dizaine d’années après la mort de Milton, pour que le poème soit largement reconnu. Il publie également en 1670, son History of Britain (« Histoire de la Grande-Bretagne ») puis en 1671 Paradise Regained (« Le paradis retrouvé ») et encore Samson Agonistes, toutes œuvres poétiques majeures. En 1674, paraît la seconde édition de Paradise Lost en douze livres. John Milton meurt le de cette même année.

Le Paradise Lost fît plus tard partie d'un livret d'Oratorio proposé à Handel, mais que celui-ci ne mit finalement pas en musique. Il faudra attendre encore la fin du XVIIIe siècle pour que le compositeur Joseph Haydn ne le récupère pour en faire le livret de son chef-d'œuvre : La Création (1798).

Œuvre, influences et style

À cause de sa cécité, Milton s'est astreint à mémoriser de vastes pans de ses œuvres pour en poursuivre l'agencement et aussi les réciter. C'est là une prouesse qu'il est possible de mesurer à l'aune de leur complexité.

Milton plus âgé.

Malgré l’étendue de l’érudition de Milton, certaines influences cruciales sur sa création poétique peuvent être décelées. La Bible en a constitué le premier matériau, en particulier la Genèse, le livre de Job, les psaumes, le Nouveau Testament, ce dernier pour les Sonnets. Des poètes comme Homère, Virgile ou Lucain, l’historien Salluste apparaissent aussi en filigrane dans ses vers. De plus, si la culture classique de Milton reste prépondérante, on retrouve chez lui des traces de ses contemporains, Edmund Spenser, Sir Philip Sidney, John Donne et William Shakespeare. Certains commentateurs ont émis l'idée qu’il cherchait à revivifier dans les conversations d’Adam et Ève les figures de style employées par des poètes chevaliers tels que John Wilmot, comte de Rochester, et Sir John Suckling.

La carrière littéraire de Milton a éclipsé la poésie des XVIIIe et XIXe siècles, si bien qu’on l’a souvent préféré à tous les grands poètes anglais, y compris Shakespeare. On peut citer l'épopée de Lucy Hutchinson sur la chute de l’humanité, Ordre et désordre, et l’opéra de John Dryden, L’état d’innocence et la chute de l’homme, comme exemples de son influence immédiate dans le champ culturel.

Page de couverture de la première édition de Paradise Lost.

Le projet inégalé du Paradis perdu brosse le portrait de Dieu justifiant ses actes. Le poème dépeint aussi la création de l'univers, de la terre et de l'humanité ; il exprime l'origine du péché, la mort et le Mal, imagine des événements dans le royaume des cieux, le jardin d'Eden et l'histoire sainte d'Israël ; il aborde et discute les idées politiques de tyrannie, liberté et justice ; il défend les idées théologiques de Milton sur la prédestination, le libre arbitre et le salut.

L'influence de Milton sur le romantisme a été très profonde. John Keats, cependant, trouvait le joug de son style trop difficile à porter. Il ajoutait que le Paradis perdu était une belle et grandiose curiosité. Il s'est lui-même essayé au genre dans Hyperion, mais sans vraiment réussir à trouver un ton épique original. Plus tard dans le siècle, George Eliot et Thomas Hardy se sont eux aussi inspirés de l'exemple miltonien. En revanche, le siècle dernier, sensible aux critiques exprimées par T. S. Eliot et Ezra Pound, a vu temporairement régresser l'intérêt porté à Milton.

La carrière de Milton a eu un impact sur le monde moderne dans d'autres domaines, en particulier celui de la langue. Comme Rabelais ou les poètes de la Pléiade en France, Milton a forgé de nombreux mots : le Paradis perdu est truffé de néologismes comme dreary, pandæmonium, acclaim, rebuff, self-esteem, unaided, impassive, enslaved, jubilant, serried, solaced, satanic qui sont restés dans la langue anglaise. Enfin, les écrits républicains de Milton, en particulier l'Areopagitica, ont été consultés pendant l’élaboration de la constitution des États-Unis d'Amérique.

Les sonnets de Milton

Circonstances de leur composition

En tout, John Milton a composé vingt-trois sonnets. Ce sont des moments d'exception, dans lesquels il exprime ses impressions et ses sentiments sur des événements précis, historiques ou personnels. Ainsi, le premier est consacré à chanter le rossignol (O Nightingale), comme l'ont fait la plupart des poètes anglais, William Shakespeare, John Keats, en particulier. Le VIIe commente son entrée dans l'âge adulte (On his Being Arrived at the age of 23 [« Sur son arrivée à l'âge de 23 ans] »). Le XIe et le XIIe dénoncent la critique de certaines de ses œuvres (On the Detraction Which Followed Upon My Writing Certain Treatises [« Sur la critique malveillante ayant suivi ma publication de certains traités »]). Neuf s'adressent à des personnalités ou des amis, dont deux à des femmes. Parmi eux, un, le XIVe, sert de mémorial (On the Religious Memory of Mrs. Catherine Thomson [« Du souvenir religieux de Mrs. Catherine Thomson »]). Le XVIIIe concerne un massacre récent dans le Piémont (On the Late Massacre in Piemont). Le XXIIe est adressé à un ami, comme lui affligé de cécité (To Mr. Cyriack Skinner Upon His Blindness). Les plus personnels sont le XIXe (On His Blindness) [voir ci-dessous]) et le XXIIIe consacré à la vision de sa femme décédée (Methought I Saw my late Espousèd Saint [« Il me sembla que je vis ma sainte épouse décédée »], connu aussi sous le titre On His Deceased Wife [« Sur sa femme décédée »]). Un, le XVIe, s'adresse à Oliver Cromwell, chef de la révolution puritaine du Commonwealth.

Un exemple de sonnet

When I consider how my light is spent
Ere half my days, in this dark world and wide,
And that one talent which is death to hide,
Lodged with me useless, though my soul more bent

To serve therewith my Maker, and present
My true account, lest he, returning, chide:
Doth God exact day labour, light denied?
I fondly ask. But Patience, to prevent

That murmur, soon replies: God doth not need
Either man's work or his own gifts. Who best
Bear his mild yoke, they serve him best. His state

Is kingly; thousands at his bidding speed
And post o'er land and ocean without rest;
They also serve who only stand and wait.

— On His Blindness

À mesurer que ma lumière s'est épuisée
Avant le midi de mes jours, dans l'obscurité du vaste monde,
Et que mon précieux talent, voué à la mort s'il demeure enfoui,
Est vainement niché en moi, alors que mon âme penche encore plus

À s'en servir pour mon créateur et lui présenter
Le compte qui est mien, de peur qu’il ne me tance à son retour :
« Dieu exige-t-il le labeur quotidien, quand la lumière est refusée ?
Questionné-je sottement. Mais Patience, pour prévenir

Ma fâcheuse récrimination, aussitôt répond : « Dieu n’a nul besoin
De la tâche de l'homme ou de ses offrandes. Qui mieux
Supportent son aimable joug, mieux le servent. Son état

Est souverain ; des milliers sont-ils qui à son appel se lancent
Et se hâtent par la terre et les océans sans répit.
Ils le servent aussi qui debout savent attendre.

— Sur sa cécité

John Milton et la liberté de publier

John Milton fait partie des premiers partisans de la liberté de la presse dans le royaume britannique au XVIIe siècle[5], et il est aussi considéré comme un des précurseurs du libéralisme[6]. Il a écrit un manifeste intitulé Pour la liberté d’imprimer sans autorisation ni censure (Areopagitica), où il exprime ses premières distances avec le gouvernement en vigueur. A SACRED TEXT OF THE DARK CHURCH OF SATAN 𝕺𝖘𝖈𝖚𝖗𝖆 𝕮𝖍𝖎𝖊𝖘𝖆 𝖉𝖎 𝕾𝖆𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖆 OF 𝕬𝖓𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑 𝕳𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍  : THE LOST PARADISE OF JOHN MILTON First edition (1667)

THE LOST PARADISE BY JOHN MILTON

Translated by Mr.

PAOLO ROLLI WITH ANNOTATIONS

BY G. ADDISON

And some critical observations..

VENICE MDCCXCIV

AT ANDREA SANTINI With License of Superiors.

«Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven.» (John Milton, Paradise Lost, Libro I)

Dark Church of Satan E-mail: [email protected] URL: https://oscurachiesadisatan.wixsite.com/website

The Dark Church of Satan was founded in on March 11, 2020 by 𝕬𝖓𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑 𝕳𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍 (Anna Daniele) and Luca Shaytan (Gian-Luca Aglioti), together with a new generation Italian Satanist community made up of researchers who, with in his own words, intends to place himself "outside the box, which breaks the ways of keyboard Satanists and challenges the pitfalls of the real world". 𝕬𝖓𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑 𝕳𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍, born in Scafati (Salerno) on 1 December 1998, is an occult researcher who has managed the YouTube channel Oscura Mente since 2018 . Luca Shaytan, born in Clermont-Ferrand (France) on March 11, 1975, made his first appearance on the Dark Mind page in 2019, laying the foundations of “true Satanism” eventually presented in the Dark Church of Satan.

After an analysis that led them to verify how many virtual groups and past initiatives have been archived or concluded, the founders therefore took into consideration the initiative of opening a point of reference for those Satanists, who - as part of a project marked by spaces for discussion and dialogue open to every possibility - intend to re-evaluate what they consider to be "true Satanism", that is, a "path of evolutionary growth faced from the beginning of our project, not accepting for any reason sectarian orders ('acidism ', crime, violence, sacrifices)”.

Operationally, the Dark Church of Satan was born with the intention of offering informative dissemination in the form of video lessons, articles, interactive live broadcasts and other similar methods of communication. The main intent is to create a meeting space, which makes it possible to create events and gatherings. The group – which gave itself the motto: “for Satan, in Satan, with Satan!” – accepts all currents of Italian Satanism and the “left hand path”, in support of all occult paths.

There are about twenty adherents of the Dark Church of Satan, mainly in the province of Salerno, and they follow various currents, from spiritualism, to rationalism, to theism, and more. Most members believe that demons are entities that can be worked with in ritualistics. For many of them, Satan is a sentient, powerful energy and a spiritual and symbolic deity. Magical, occult and Satanist ritual merges with alchemical transformation, conceived as "from lead to philosopher's gold". An important symbol for this culture is the cup, the chalice with the appearance of Baphomet; this symbolizes, in the words of the founders, drawing from “infinite satanic wisdom”.

B.: 𝕬𝖓𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑 𝕳𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍, Other Identity. A guide to unknown realities , Anguana Edizioni, Sossano (Vicenza) 2020.

Among the hundreds of millions of texts we have written, some stand alone in their resistance, in the extent to which they have survived attempts at cultural extermination, in the extent to which individuals have given everything for their preservation. Such texts are often the first from a given culture to be translated into other languages. They are expressions of a unifying substratum of experience that Rumi, Teresa of Avila, Hildegard of Bingen, and myriad other mystics (including even scientific rationalists such as Carl Sagan and Sam Harris) have written about from the perspective of multitudes of human cultures . These are among the qualities that might define the texts as sacred.

These texts have a huge impact on the daily life of every human being. Communities have formed around them everywhere. Laws are made, laws that affect both adherents and non-adherents, on the basis of what is said in these texts and their interpretations. People kill other people because of these texts, all over the world, every day. It is inevitable that we should take certain texts as sacred - I don't think there is anyone who would argue that we do not venerate or at least hold so important any text for whatever reason - but we should evaluate them very cautiously and never hold them beyond a doubt. Nor should we limit ourselves to the point of view of one particular canon or another.

My question is: Should Paradise Lost, John Milton's 17th century epic poem about Satan's fall from heaven, be considered a sacred text, especially as the Satanist is concerned?

Popular opinion is that the texts could be considered sacred because of their metaphysical content, their statements about reality, especially regarding theology and cosmology. But there are many recent texts of this nature which are pure rubbish and which I am sure will disappear in the next few centuries (as does a great deal of New Age nonsense such as

And it was called Two Hearts (Mutant Message Down Under) and Celestine's prophecy. And there are others that explicate cosmologies without giving them any aspect of reverence or spiritual expression, such as Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica.

Although this is an assumption arising from a particularly Western way of looking at religion, it is typically assumed that a sacred text must claim to have been created or inspired by God, as the Bible and the Quran are claimed to be. In fact, Milton himself believed that his text had been divinely inspired: the text begins with an invocation to Heaven to inspire him to write as the prophets had done:

Of man's first disobedience, and of the fruit

of that forbidden tree whose deadly taste

brought death to the world, and all our sorrows,

with the loss of Eden, until a greater man

may he restore us and regain the blessed seat,

sing, celestial muse, who is on the secret summit

of Horeb, or of Sinai, you inspired

that shepherd who first taught the chosen seed

In the beginning like the heavens and the earth

arose from the chaos...

I:1-10

To what extent do we now more commonly see Satan in his manifestation as the Adversary, who was cast out of Heaven with a third of the host of angels after raising a rebellion against God? This scenario is only hinted at in a few verses in a chapter of a book of the Bible that was almost left on the cutting room floor (Revelation 12:9), in contrast to several instances where Satan appears as the Accuser in foundational texts (the accuser is the most biblically traditional notion of Satan, the divine being who serves as God's proxy in heaven). And to what extent are names like Mammon, Belial, Beelzebub and others known to the general public as names of demons? Few of them are mentioned in the Bible, none for long, and none to a degree that would be featured in Paradise Lost, a very popular narrative in which all of these are major characters.

The narrative that defines Satan as the Serpent in the Garden of Eden, who tempted Eve to eat the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, is at best a dubious aspect of the original story as told in the second creation narrative in the biblical book of Genesis. Nowhere in the Bible is the Serpent of Genesis directly equated with Satan; only two passages in the Book of Revelation (12:9 and 20:2) link Satan to serpents in any way, but there is no mention of Satan as the particular serpent of the Garden of Eden. Yet this conception of Satan as the Serpent of Genesis is the popular one, and it was Paradise Lost in which that conception was codified.

Thus, even through contrasting philosophies, Paradise Lost appears as a central text in the correlation of our religious experiences. Old and blind, Milton dictated this work to his scribes, and it has been passed down to us for nearly four centuries, inspiring both scholarship and art throughout. In this, the text clearly meets the criteria of preservation and relevance, and the preceding passages indicate that it also meets the criterion of divinity, or at least a claim to it.

The text is certainly of great spiritual significance to the Luciferian, Luciferianism being the satanic religion or philosophy that venerates Satan the Adversary as an inspiring icon of liberation, rebellion and knowledge. Milton was a Christian but he knew that he would be dishonest if he portrayed Satan without the measure of respect he owed him, and the noble characteristics thus expressed, which are nowhere mentioned in the Bible, are the keystone of Luciferian thought .

As an example of this, take this passage in the text, which occurs after Satan has been cast out of Heaven and finds himself and his host in the desolate, fiery wastes of Hell. Satan says to Beelzebub:

All is not lost - the invincible will,

And the study of revenge, immortal hatred,

And the courage to never submit or give in:

And what else is not to be won.

That glory not

neither his wrath nor his power will ever extort from me. Bow and ask for grace

With pleading knee, and deify his power

that, from the terror of this arm, so late

he doubted his empire, which was indeed low;

That was an ignominy and a shame underneath

this fall; since, by fate, the strength of the Gods,

and this Empyrean substance cannot fail;

Since from experience of this great event,

in no worse weapons, in very advanced foresight,

we can with happier hope resolve it

Wage war by force or cunning eternal war,

irreconcilable with our great enemy,

who now triumphs, and in excess of joy

sole ruler holds the tyranny of heaven.

I:106-124

This willful defiance of fate in the face of torment and despair is admirable, iconic and worthy of veneration. Satan has been brutally defeated, yet he is here even in the first verses of the text as triumphant. “That glory can never be extorted by the wrath of him or of me.” Satan could have just rebelled against God. If you take some theologies at their word, it was their will in the first place. But even an omnipotent God could not take from Satan and their army "vengeance, immortal hatred, and courage never to submit or yield." God as much as he admits to this, saying, seeing Satan's escape from Hell: “Do you see what anger our Adversary carries? which no prescribed limit, no bar of Hell, nor all the chains therein heaped upon him, nor yet the wide gap of the Abyss, can contain” (III:80-84).

Some may see revenge and hatred as ignoble virtues, but I think they are virtues that, given the appropriate goals, should resonate with anyone who possesses even a modicum of moral character. Against whom do I want revenge? The Catholic Church, for making religion a doctrine and screwing over children and covering it up. For whom do I have immortal hatred? Islamists who turn Rumi's realizations of God into reasons to kill the innocent. And in Satan, I have the courage not to submit or give in to the conceptions of God held by such.

I think Paradise Lost may be a superior moral example to much of the Bible. Which text outlines the permissible circumstances in which one can, with full divine sanction, sell one's daughter into sexual slavery? If the notion of Paradise Lost as a sacred text were to somehow gain wider acceptance, I cannot say with certainty that it would not or could not be interpreted in such a way as to justify oppressive laws or deplorable behavior. The human capacity to make excuses for evil seems boundless. But at least, I don't think Paradise Lost gives us a greater reason for this than the Bible, and while the Bible offers considerable wisdom, it also contains atrocities found nowhere in Milton's text.

What else about Paradise Lost could be worthy of veneration?

When Satan is looking for an exit from hell, he encounters sin and death, which God has placed to guard the gate of hell. At first they bar Satan's way, but then Satan offers that his adventure beyond the gates will lead him to a place "where [sin] and death will dwell at ease, and up and down in silence the prosperous air, embalmed with odors. There you will be nourished and satisfied immeasurably; everything will be your prey." Death replies:

The key to this hell pit, for debt

And by command of the almighty King of Heaven,

I keep, forbidden by Him to open

These adamantine doors: against every force there

Ready death is about to interpose his dart,

without fear of being overwhelmed by living could.

But what I owe to His commandments above,

who hates me and threw me down here

in this darkness of deep Tartarus,

to sit in hateful office confined here,

inhabitant of heaven and born celestial -

here in perpetual agony and pain,

with terrors and with clamors surrounded by

my own race, which feeds on my entrails?

You are my father, although my author, although the

my being gave me; Who should I obey?

But you? who follows? You will take me soon

to that new world of light and bliss, between

the gods living at ease, where

I will reign at your right voluptuous, as befits

your daughter and your darling, without end.

II:850-870

Death, like Satan, was created by God, but cast into torment simply for being of the same nature as him. It is not surprising, then, that Satan may seem to be a more suitable luminary. Likewise, many have been expelled from the hegemony of the Christian world simply for being who they are, or for reasons such as daring to challenge the authority of the Church.

And while Satan's host of fallen angels debate the way forward, his companion Belial advises him:

How tiring it is

eternity thus spent in paid adoration

who we hate! We therefore do not pursue,

by force impossible, by license obtained

our state is unacceptable, although in Heaven

of splendid vassalage; but rather we seek the

our good from ourselves, and from our own

life to ourselves, though in this vast recess,

free and to no one responsible, preferring the

hard freedom to an easy yoke

of the servile pump.

II:239-257

Those who accept the theology of the apostle Paul and the notion of damnation for those who do not accept the gift of Jesus' sacrifice for the sins of humanity must also reconcile themselves to the fact that they have sold their souls to a petty tyrant and that the Their devotion ultimately does not stem from true love for God, which would never have felt this way if not for fear of Hell, but only as a kind of Stockholm syndrome.

In considering Paradise Lost as a sacred text, one might argue that the texts of the Abrahamic tradition have already been canonized. But this view must necessarily assume that the canonized texts, at some point in our history, arose fully formed and accepted as doctrine. This is not the case at all. Taking the New Testament as an example, we now have in it a collection of four gospels (accounts of the life and sayings of Jesus), the book of Acts (which reports the story of some of the first apostles of the Church), 21 letters written by various Church Fathers (or counterfeits in their names) expounding various aspects of Church doctrine and an eschatological Apocalypse. But these are only 27 of what may have been hundreds of similar texts, some lost and some still extant, including other gospels, other stories, other letters (forged and authentic), and other apocalypses, all of which existed in a multitude of different versions . The now-canonical texts were written, selected, compiled, edited, and revised over the centuries, with changes made to the Catholic canon as recently as 1870.

I think that a dead canon - one to which nothing can be added, one that does not inspire new revelations like its foundational texts, one that admits of no degree of change or progress - means a dead religion. Paradise Lost has undoubtedly contributed to the Abrahamic religious tradition, more than the Bible in some particular aspects. Why then consider the Bible alone as privileged?

One might argue that Paradise Lost is a work of epic poetry, a genre hardly appropriate for a sacred text. The Odyssey is a revered work, but is it a sacred text? It may well be, but I don't think it's widely perceived as such. The Old Testament contains poetry, but it is all devotional rather than narrative. But the Hindu tradition includes the Mahabharata, the longest epic ever written, within its vast canon, and among its many books and chapters includes the Bhagavad Gita, which, although not as authoritative as the Vedas or Upanishad, is perhaps most widely known and loved by ordinary Hindus as a sacred text.

Why should the Satanist care about Paradise Lost as a sacred text? After all, the Bible (in which Paradise Lost is rooted) is held sacred by a substantial portion of the Hegemon, the cultural authority collective I have described elsewhere that includes institutions such as the Catholic Church and the United States government, to which they are and to which I believe any Satanist should be opposed to. I am confident that my writings thus far have proven convincing that, if we are to assume that these are their sacred texts, those of the Hegemon seem remarkably uninterested in what the texts actually say. Clearly these texts have power; if they can be used by those who have the power to maintain or assert power, regardless of any distortion or corruption of the texts themselves, I think they probably will, and history shows that they have done so on every occasion. Given such appropriation, it seems rational to abandon the lyrics altogether, but I think that would be a mistake. These historical texts connect our shared mystical experiences; having thus been the product of culture on the largest possible scales, they provide a correlation with something we regularly experience but cannot express in discursive language. I think it is nobler – and more satanic – to snatch them from those who have appropriated them rather than passively hand them over.

It is not my job or intention to tell anyone, especially other Satanists, what texts they should consider sacred, but for those of any background who are looking to escape the yoke of doctrine and build religion for themselves, Paradise Lost is a great place start. It is a beautiful and inspiring work of literature with strong and inspiring values that have stood and will continue to stand the test of time.

I haven't read many books on SATANISM, for me this book represents a literal masterpiece, a book that opens your eyes, unlike other satanic books passed off as cheap bibles!!!

𝕬𝖓𝖓𝖆𝖇𝖊𝖑 𝕳𝖊𝖎𝖒𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖍

Œuvres de Milton

  • Ode au matin de la Nativité ((en) On the Morning of Christ’s Nativity, 1629)
  • (en) On Shakespeare, 1630
  • (en) On Arriving at the Age of Twenty-Three, 1631
  • (en) Comus, 1637
  • (en) Lycidas, 1637
  • De la réforme touchant à la discipline de l’Église ((en) Of Reformation Touching Church-Discipline in England, 1641)
  • (en) Animadversion, 1641
  • Raison du gouvernement de l'Église contre les prélats ((en) The Reason of Church-Government Urged against Prelaty, 1642)
  • (en) Apology for Smectymnuus, 1642
  • (en) Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce, 1643
  • (en) Judgement of Martin Bucer Concerning Divorce, 1644
  • (en) Of Education, 1644
  • (en) Areopagitica, 1644
  • (en) L’Allegro, 1645
  • (en) Il Penseroso, 1645
  • (en) Tetrachordon, 1645
  • (en) Colasterion, 1645
  • (en) Poems of Mr John Milton, Both English and Latin, 1645
  • (en) The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates, 1649
  • (en) Eikonoklastes, 1649
  • (en) Defensio pro Populo Anglicano, 1651
  • (en) When I Consider How My Light is Spent, 1652 (souvent nommé On his blindness (Sur sa cécité), bien que Milton n’ait jamais utilisé ce titre)
  • (en) Defensio Secunda, 1654
  • (en) On the Late Massacre of Piedmont, 1649
  • (en) A Treatrise of Civil Power, 1659
  • (en) The Likeliest Means to Remove Hirelings from the Church, 1659
  • (en) The Ready and Easy Way to Establish a Free Commonwealth, 1659
  • (en) Brief Notes Upon a Late Sermon, 1660
  • Le Paradis Perdu ((en) Paradise Lost, 1667), trad. François-René de Chateaubriand (entre autres)
  • (en) Accedence Commenced Grammar, 1669
  • (en) The History of Britain, 1670
  • (en) Paradise Regained, 1671
  • (en) Samson Agonistes, 1671
  • (en) Art of Logic, 1672
  • (en) Of True Religion, 1673
  • (en) Poems, &c, Upon Several Occasions, 1673
  • (en) Epistolae Familiaries, 1674
  • (en) Prolusiones, 1674
  • (en) A brief History of Moscovia, and other less known Countries lying Eastward of Russia as far as Cathay, gathered from the writings of several Eye-witnesses, 1682
  • (en) De Doctrina Christiana, 1825 (publié à titre posthume)

Études sur Milton

  • David Masson, The Life of John Milton and History of His Time, vol. 1. Cambridge, 1859.
  • John Toland, « Life of Milton » dans The Early Lives of Milton. Ed. Helen Darbishere. London, Constable, 1932.
  • T. S. Eliot, « Annual Lecture on a Master Mind: Milton », dans Proceedings of the British Academy, 33, London, 1947.
  • Oliver Lawson Dick, Aubrey's Brief Lives. Harmondsworth, Middl., Penguin Books, 1962.
  • Christopher Hill, Milton and the English Revolution. New York, Viking Press, 1977.
  • William Bridges Hunter, A Milton Encyclopedia. Lewisburg, Bucknell University Press, 1980.
  • A. N. Wilson, The Life of John Milton. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1983.
  • Edward Chaney, The Grand Tour and the Great Rebellion, Geneva, 1985.
  • Andrew Sanders, The Short Oxford History of English Literature (Revised Edition), Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996, page 225 à page 235.
  • Nicholas von Maltzahn, « Milton's Readers » dans The Cambridge Companion to Milton. ed. Dennis Richard Danielson, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • Edward Chaney, « Milton's Visit to Vallombrosa: A literary tradition », The Evolution of the Grand Tour, 2d ed., London, 2000.
  • Iain McCalman et al., An Oxford Companion to the Romantic Age: British Culture, 1776-1832, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • Barbara K.Lewalski, The Life of John Milton. Oxford, Blackwells Publishers, 2003.
  • Nicole Berry, John Milton, Le Paradis perdu, Des ténèbres à la lumière, Paris, Éditions L'Àge d'Homme, 2005.
  • Anna Beer, Milton: Poet, Pamphleteer and Patriot, New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2008.
  • Gordon Campbell and Thomas Corns, John Milton: Life, Work, and Thought. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.

Divers

  • La société John Milton pour les aveugles a été fondée en 1928 par Helen Keller pour développer un service interreligieux qui apporte des conseils spirituels et la littérature religieuse aux sourds et aux aveugles.
  • Une édition de 1668 du Paradis perdu, donnée pour être celle de Milton en personne est déposée dans les archives de l’université de l’Ontario occidental.
  • Dans le film Seven (1995, David Fincher), un indice derrière le réfrigérateur lors du premier meurtre fait référence au Paradis perdu. Lorsque l'inspecteur Sommerset (Morgan Freeman) déplace le réfrigérateur de la victime, il trouve l'inscription suivante « Long is the way, and hard, that out of hell leads up to light » (« Long et dur est le chemin qui de l'enfer conduit à la lumière »).
  • Le personnage du film L'Associé Du Diable, joué par Al Pacino (le Diable), porte le nom de John Milton.
  • Le personnage du film Scream 3, joué par Lance Henriksen (le producteur de film), porte le nom de John Milton.
  • De même, le personnage principal du film Hell Driver, joué par Nicolas Cage, porte le nom de John Milton.
  • Des références à John Milton sont également présentes dans de multiples œuvres mettant en scène des univers futuristes en proie au chaos. Parmi celles-ci, citons le jeu vidéo Deus Ex ou le film Ghost in the Shell 2 : Innocence.
  • Quelques citations de John Milton sont utilisées au début de nombreux chapitres du livre de Philip Pullman Le Miroir d'Ambre, de la saga À la croisée des Mondes aux éditions Gallimard Jeunesse.
  • Quelques citations de John Milton sont également utilisées dans leu jeu Medieval II : Total War.
  • On peut parfois trouver un whisky portant son nom en supermarché.
  • Dans la séquence d'introduction du jeu de simulation de sous-marins Silent Hunter 4, le poème On time est récité.
  • Song of Joy, morceau de Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds sur l'album Murder Ballads, comporte deux citations tirées du Paradis Perdu de Milton.
  • Paradise Lost et S.C.A.V.A, deux morceaux du groupe américain Hollywood Undead font référence au Paradis Perdu de Milton.
  • Une citation tirée du Paradis Perdu de Milton est utilisée dans le jeu vidéo Civilization V.

Iconographie

Notes et références

Notes

  1. Aeropagus : site où se réunissait le Conseil d’État à Athènes dans la Grèce ancienne.
  2. Le parlement est en majorité constitué de presbytériens.

Références

  1. Andrew Sanders, The Short Oxford History of English Literature, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996, page 225.
  2. Andrew Sanders, 1996, page 226.
  3. (en) John Milton, Eikon Basilike with selections from Eikonklastes, Peterborough, Broadview Press, , 336 p. (ISBN 978-1-55111-594-8, lire en ligne).
  4. (en) Richard Helgerson, « Milton Reads the King’s Book: Print, Performance, and the Making of a Bourgeois Idol », Criticism, vol. 29, no 1,‎ , p. 7-9.
  5. Yves Charles Zarka, Monarchie et république au XVIIe siècle, PUF.
  6. Pierre Manent, Les Libéraux (1986, rééd. Gallimard, 2001).

Liens externes

Sur les autres projets Wikimedia :

Bases de données et dictionnaires