Thanks Finn R,

Your answer helped,

Best regards,

Huib

Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Finn Rindahl
Verzonden: zondag 15 februari 2009 14:58
Aan: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List
Onderwerp: Re: [Commons-l] Policy

Let's not open the whole debate again, to (hopefully) answer Huivs question - there is a other policy and a way to implement it, see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators/Inactivity_section

There was a new run scheduled for february 6th, but it doesn't seem anyone felt that organising this was their responsibility. (Anyone could have done it, but everyone thought someone else would do it in so noone did). I'm waiting for someone else myself ;)

Finn R

2009/2/15 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>

Hoi,
The notion that you "have to" desysop people when they are inactive is a falacy on several levels. When people are trusted, they can imho be an admin. In many ways it is an old debate but the difference is that you delete people.
Thanks,
GerardM

2009/2/15 <[email protected]>

Hello,

I need some information I can't really fin don Commons.

We have a policy that says you have to do 5 admin actions in 6 months to keep your adminship, we have sererval users that doesn't have any admin actions for more than a year, can those user be desysoped on Meta or is there a other policy?

Best regards,

Huiv

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l