Multichill

Welcome to my talk page. Use it; don't send me e-mail. I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise).

February 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022

Materiality of a painting

You reverted this edit https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q3305213&diff=prev&oldid=2176005672 but it was a solution to this recent change: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q110304307&diff=prev&oldid=2111632452 that make sense. Currently items instances of painting (Q3305213) are not anymore ontologicaly physical objects. This is an issue that require a solution. Best regards Shonagon (talk) 23:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Time zone in Groningen

Can I ask why Groningen can't have statement about time zone? I read Property talk:P421 and understand Time zones should only appear in the higher administrative levels, but almost every city on wikidata has this statement and I don't see the problem about it. Like why not? Also I don't thinks its redundant data. I am sorry if I'm asking stupid question, but I want to understand why. Thanks. Daniel Vincenc (talk) 13:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

@Daniel Vincenc: it's not a stupid question. It's currently used on over 2 million items because it's easier to just slam it on everywhere. A time zone is transitive. Just like we say for located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) Egmond aan Zee (Q1616324) -> Bergen (Q9901) -> North Holland (Q701) and not Egmond aan Zee (Q1616324) -> North Holland (Q701), we should only have the time zone on the province. Not all the underlying municipalities, cities, villages and other places. See Property_talk:P421#Transitive_instead_of_data_duplication. Multichill (talk) 16:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, now I understand why. Have a nice day :) Daniel Vincenc (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

SMAK.BE url resolver

Hello! While cleaning some unproper merges I stumbled upon artworks that you imported from the SMAK in Gant, like Q22259650. Since 2016 however the URL for the collection has changed, and the url http://resolver.smak.be/collection/work/data/1478 used for statements and references doesn't resolve anymore. The ID however seems to stay the same, and the new working url is https://smak.be/fr/ouvrages-d-art/studie-voor-dubbelsculptuur-2-1478. Is there a possibility that you could recrawl the SMAK collection to update the URL? --Jahl de Vautban (talk) 04:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

DigitaltMuseum

Hello! Your bot keeps (re)adding art-related restrictions to DigitaltMuseum ID (P7847), even after I've reverted them. I suspect this is because it's an instance of Wikidata property to identify artworks (Q44847669)? While it's true that this identifier is used for artworks, it's also used for people, organizations, events and others, so right now, we have restrictions claiming that e.g. Pablo Picasso (Q5593) and World War II (Q362) should be instances of artwork. What's the best course of action to avoid this? Einar Myre (talk) 06:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

@Einar Myre: if it also covers other domains, you shouldn't be using Wikidata property to identify artworks (Q44847669). I replaced it with Wikidata property related to art (Q27918607). Multichill (talk) 10:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Can you please block User:Openaccess cma again?

The bot is making the same errors as before, as recently as four hours ago. Thanks!!! Swpb (talk) 14:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)