Talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement draft guidelines review: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 595:
::I think this will lead to a lot of argument about what a conflict of interest is. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 09:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
:::I think you're talking about "What if the admin is someone's father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate?" Yes, that might turn up as an issue, but I'm talking about giving admins the maximum opportunity possible to do the job well. It would be better to err on the side of avoiding even the appearance of impropriety. Creating a tradition of "Admins can recuse themselves and they don't have to say why; they're probably just being extra careful" would be a plus for everyone.[[User:Darkfrog24|Darkfrog24]] ([[User talk:Darkfrog24|talk]]) 01:54, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
::::I would go further and state that "Should any admin find themselves in a position where a conflict of interest '''MIGHT''' be suspected or where they have in the past interacted with one of the parties in a manner that suggests that they '''MIGHT''' have exercised their judgement as to circumstances surrounding the earlier incident, then they are expected to recuse themselves". [[User:Martinvl|Martinvl]] ([[User talk:Martinvl|talk]]) 21:29, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
== Unable to handle ==
| |||