Meta:Requests for adminship
Most requests should be listed here for at least seven days; bureaucrats should only close after the minimum time foreseen in the relevant policy. Discussions are not closed early. Adminship will be granted by a support ratio of at least 75%. If a request hasn't been addressed by a bureaucrat after a lengthy period of time, please leave a note at Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat. Requests may be extended, or put on hold by bureaucrats, pending decision or finding of consensus.
Requests for temporary adminship and bot requests may be less formal and often go for a shorter duration if consensus becomes clear after only a few days of discussion.
All editors with an account on Meta, at least one active account on any Wikimedia project, and a link between the two, may participate in any request and give their opinion of the candidate. However, more active Meta editors' opinions may be given additional weight in controversial cases.
See below for information on prerequisites on submitting a request, and how to add a nomination.
Information
Note that this page is for access on Meta only. See the permission request to stewards page for adminship/deadminship requests on other projects.
Regular adminship
- Before requesting admin access, please check the policy for requesting adminship.
- Use the box below, insert your username:
- Place a request on this page, by transcluding the subpage, for example
{{Meta:Requests for adminship/Username}}
. Please put the newest request on the top. Bear in mind that even if you do meet the criteria above this does not mean that the community will automatically approve a request. - Please note, past administrators who have given up their rights must meet all criteria at the time of the new request. There is no separate process for reinstating past administrators.
Please note: Ill-considered nominations for adminship can be draining and deflating to both the community and the candidate. Any successful candidate will need to be able to demonstrate sufficient experience within the Wikimedia community, in addition to a familiarity with Meta-Wiki. If a candidate is not already a local administrator or holder of advanced permissions on a Wikimedia content project, they are less likely to pass a request for adminship here at Meta-Wiki.
Bureaucratship
Add your request below under the bureaucratship section. Please note:
- Only active administrators can become bureaucrats, and only after at least 6 months of regular adminship.
- User is endorsed by two current bureaucrats after they nominate themselves here.
If you fail any of these requirements, you will not be assigned the bureaucrat flag. For more information see the Meta bureaucrat page.
Other access
For these types of access, create a subpage just as you would for regular adminship and add it to the appropriate section of this page.
- Interface adminship: Please read the Meta interface administrator page. The WMF requires two-factor authentication for this access.
- Limited adminship: If you need sysop access for a particular reason (such as ability to edit protected pages), you may request limited adminship on Meta. If granted, the user understands that they will only be allowed to use the tools for the tasks they were approved, and not doing so will be grounds for immediate removal. Temporary sysop access will normally be valid for one month unless requested and granted otherwise.
- Bot: Please read the bot policy. This wiki allows global bots and automatic approval of certain types of bots; for other bots, add your request below under the bot section, in the same way as an admin request.
- CheckUser: please read the CheckUser policy and add your request below under the checkuser section, in the same way as an admin request.
- Oversight: please read the Oversight policy and add your request below under the oversight section, in the same way as an admin request.
- Translation administrator: please read Meta translation administrator page and Meta’s page about translate extension. No fixed time limit for these requests is defined, and there are no particular requirements; if you provide a valid reason and demonstrate that you know and understand how to prepare pages for translation, your request will most likely be granted.
- CentralNotice administrator: Meta Central notice administrator page grant access to manage and edit banner campaigns. Because of the potentially huge impact of banners on the wikis, this should be granted carefully and sparingly. The WMF requires two-factor authentication for this access.
For these types of access, just ask on Meta request for help from a sysop or bureaucrat page:
- MassMessage senders: please read about MassMessages, and provide a clear reason for requesting access. Specify whether you need it temporarily or permanently.
- Uploaders
- Patrollers
Requests for global renamer permissions are handled at global permission requests to stewards page.
WMF Office Staff and Contractors
- If you are an WMF Official or Contractor and need rights on Meta-Wiki to perform your duties the process is different. Please have a look at the WMF staff userrights policy on Office wiki[restricted access] and follow the procedure described there. If in doubt, please contact Trust and Safety; or send an email to cawikimediaorg.(source)
Requests for regular adminship
Requests for limited adminship
Requests for interface adminship
- Please see Meta:Interface administrators before applying. Regular administrators may apply directly at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.
Requests for bureaucratship
Requests for CheckUser access
- "Meta:Requests for checkuser" redirects here. To request checkuser information, see Meta:Requests for CheckUser information.
Requests for Oversight access
- "Meta:Requests for oversight" redirects here. To request oversighting, see Meta:Oversighters#Requests.
Requests for translation adminship
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
- Eva Martin (WMDE) (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.
As a Wikimedia Deutschland staff member I frequently create and edit project pages on meta. I would like to be able to mark these pages for translation to make our content and the information we share with the Movement accessible for non English speaking audiences. My first request was denied due to my lack of proper knowledge concerning on-wiki translations. Since then, I studied the help page on translation administration and learned with the help of Léa Lacroix how to properly prepare pages for translation and edit pages already marked for translation. You can verify my work in the following project pages:
- Wikimedia Deutschland/Movement Strategy and Global Relations
- WIKIMOVE
- Wikimedia Summit 2022/Online Platform
- Wikimedia Deutschland/Decentralized Fundraising, Centralized Distribution
- Wikimedia Deutschland/The Future of Wikimedia Governance
I would appreciate if you could consider my request, and of course let me know if there is something I should still learn and improve. Thanks in advance! Best, --Eva Martin (WMDE) (talk) 08:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral I have still got some concerns:
- On “Wikimedia Deutschland/Movement Strategy and Global Relations”, you fully broke the page translatability.
- On “Wikimedia Summit 2022/Online platform”, you did not comply with the recommendations about headings. Also, the <languages/> should be at the top of the page. The remainder of the segmentation is fine.
- On “Wikimedia Deutschland/Decentralized Fundraising, Centralized Distribution”, you provided some tweaks which were not real improvements in my opinion (since the unit only contain a link, it may be fine to only wrap the link text; also the recommendation is to use a digit as tvar name for a link targets), whereas there were other improvements which could be made (see @Pppery’s changes).
- On “Wikimedia Deutschland/The Future of Wikimedia Governance”, your both edits (1, 2) are clearly wrong in regards to internationalization.
- -- Pols12 (talk) 13:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Pols12. * Pppery * it has begun 23:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Thanks a lot for pointing out the issues, and fixing some of them. I just wanted to mention that some of the edits you listed have been performed in November 2022 or January 2023 ; in the meantime, I gave Eva an intensive training, and her latest contributions are much more in line with the community rules and guidelines. Speaking of guidelines, we tried to keep track of the various community guidelines, and I took the opportunity to update my knowledge about some of them that got updated in the past few years (for example, to not wrap a header in its own translate tags and have it as part of the paragraph instead), and some of my "old" knowledge may persist in the earliest edits of Eva. We both learned a lot, and I believe that she is ready to autonomously mark pages for translation.
- I'm aware that having more staff individuals to work only on "their own" pages is not really what the community needs on Meta - but I guess it is still better than having page maintainers not being able to mark for translation, possibly leaving those pages outdated and poorly translated. We all want to build a set of great, multilingual documentation pages, and affiliate staff can contribute to that, even if they start with a limited set of pages. Thanks for your understanding, Lea Lacroix (WMDE) (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- I have only reviewed the mentioned pages. Indeed, they probably do not show Eva’s recent capacity building.
- Translate markup syntax is really complex (worst: guidelines are not applied in the same way through WMF wikis), we surely miss a training tool.
- Note having translate tags inside heading syntax has ever been discouraged, but this technical recommendation is unfortunately still not applied, especially by WMF staff and sysadmins which are not granted through this RFA process. -- Pols12 (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support like last time --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support the reasoning given by Lea Lacroix (WMDE) seems convincing enough. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 07:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support AlPaD (talk) 07:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Done - concerns have been addressed. --MF-W 11:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Requests for CentralNotice adminship
Requests for bot flags
See also
- Current administrators
- Current removal discussions
- Previous confirmation discussions (obsolete)
- Index of requests and proposals
- Information on user groups
- Meta–steward relationship
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation