In T288370#9877788, @bd808 wrote:

#wikimedia-cloud on 2024-06-10

[20:47]  <    wm-bb> <ederporto> Hello, is there anyone here who works with Codex and can help me integrate it into Figma? I can't find it in the library modal. There is an instruction to join a Slack channel to ask for help, but I was unsuccessful in joining. Thanks :)
[20:50]  <AntiComposite> ederporto: the only way for non-staff to contact the Design folks is by following the instructions at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Design_System_Team/Working_with_us
[20:51]  <AntiComposite> the links in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Design_System_Team/Resources#For_designers and https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Design_System_Team/Announcing_Codex_1.0 may or may not be helpful, I don't know.

[21:08]  <    wm-bb> <ederporto> Thank you, but those links are the ones that direct to the Slack channel if someone has questions. I just wanted to draft design in Figma before implementing Codex in a new tool I'm developing (re @wmtelegram_bot: <AntiComposite> the links in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Design_System_Team/Resources#For_designers and https://www.mediawiki...)

Afaik the only way for non-design team staff is to copy components from here as appropriate and paste them into your Figma file where they will show up as usable components. Unless you have the premium tier of Figma, you can’t use it as a library without the design team releasing it.

Hi @RoySmith, could you try removing User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck-sb.js from your common.js and seeing if the issue still occurs? That seemed to break it for me.

Can't replicate on Firefox 119/Windows 11
On rev 1179715699

I understand there may also be an issue with this causing too many requests per T305318, so maybe locking it to sysops, users with over 100 reviews, etc would be best if implemented.

So looking at this, there are a few possible solutions to this:

In T290994#7359768, @AntiCompositeNumber wrote:

In T290994#7359669, @Berrely wrote:

This doesn't appear to only be for Twinkle; I'm not sure of the exact cause (I'm very sure it's not one of my scripts), but it seems some gadgets(?) on Commons seem to be having the same behaviour. Screenshot below:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Gadget-editDropdown.js&diff=591651294&oldid=431891324

This doesn't appear to only be for Twinkle; I'm not sure of the exact cause (I'm very sure it's not one of my scripts), but it seems some gadgets(?) on Commons seem to be having the same behaviour. Screenshot below:

I'm just saying, this would be massively useful for creating mockups for non-WMF volunteers. Having to manually create each element is a nightmare and also leads to inaccuracies.

For me it's also scaled down to about half the size and aligned to the right.

@Esanders The behaviour appears to have got better, but it is still glitchy. There is no windows to confirm whether you want plain text or normal text. On certain pages it is worse than others.

Uncaught TypeError: editform is null
    <anonymous> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wugapodes/Capricorn.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript:791
    jQuery 4
        fire
        fireWith
        tuple[0]
        using
    enqueue https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php?lang=en-gb&modules=startup&only=scripts&raw=1&skin=vector:11
    using jQuery
    <anonymous> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wugapodes/Capricorn.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript:14
    jQuery 4
        fire
        fireWith
        done
        callback
index.php:791:6
    <anonymous> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wugapodes/Capricorn.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript:791
    jQuery 4
        fire
        fireWith
        tuple[0]
        using
    enqueue https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php?lang=en-gb&modules=startup&only=scripts&raw=1&skin=vector:11
    using jQuery
    <anonymous> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wugapodes/Capricorn.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript:14
    jQuery 4
        fire
        fireWith
        done
        callback

These appear to be my userscripts.

This still seems to be an issue, 1234qwer's RegEx should fix it.