Laparoscopic ALIF is an evolving technique requiring the participation of a laparoscopic surgeon experienced in advanced laparoscopic techniques and knowledgeable in anterior lumbar spinal exposures. Initial enthusiasm for this technique was fostered by the development of interbody fusion devices and a method of exposing the anterior lumbar spine, which takes advantage of the ability of minimally invasive surgeries to improve exposure and visualization while minimizing collateral tissue damage and injury to healthy tissue. Preliminary studies have demonstrated laparoscopic ALIF feasibility. These same studies have been able to prove only minor advantages with the laparoscopic versus open technique using the current implants and bone grafting techniques for single-level disc disease. General acceptance of laparoscopic ALIF awaits further investigation. Reasons for a lack of general acceptance include the expense of the interbody fusion devices and laparoscopic equipment, the unfamiliarity of this advanced laparoscopic technique to spine and general surgeons, and the steep learning curve of the procedure. Intraoperative complications that arise are often severe, such as vascular injuries. Many skeptics appropriately believe that initial enthusiasm and zealousness must be tempered with scientific effort that provides data from long-term follow-up. For laparoscopic ALIF to gain general acceptance, randomized comparisons of laparoscopic ALIF to open ALIF and posterior lumbar spinal fusion and controlled studies with long-term follow-up documenting symptomatic outcome variables and spinal fusion rates must be completed. As new modalities are developed, minimally invasive techniques may facilitate their utility. The indications, procedures, and surgical principles of ALIF are unchanged, and physicians must not invent indications to justify the technique; however, eventually we may be able to redefine the indications to take full advantage of the endoscopic techniques and biological advances.