A method for quantitatively estimating lesion "size" from mammographic images was developed and evaluated. The main idea behind the measure, termed "integrated density" (ID), is that the total x-ray attenuation attributable to an object is theoretically invariant with respect to the projected view and object deformation. Because it is possible to estimate x-ray attenuation of a lesion from relative film densities, after appropriate corrections for background, the invariant property of the measure is expected to result in an objective method for evaluating the "sizes" of breast lesions. ID was calculated as the integral of the estimated image density attributable to a lesion, relative to surrounding background, over the area of the lesion and after corrections for the nonlinearity of the film characteristic curve. This effectively provides a measure proportional to lesion volume. We computed ID and more traditional measures of size (such as "mass diameter" and "effective size") for 100 pairs of ipsilateral mammographic views, each containing a lesion that was relatively visible in both views. The correlation between values calculated for each measure from corresponding pairs of ipsilateral views were computed and compared. All three size-related measures (mass diameter, effective size, and ID) exhibited reasonable linear relationship between paired views (r2>0.7, P<0.001). Specifically, the ID measures for the 100 masses were found to be highly correlated (r2=0.9, P<0.001) between ipsilateral views of the same mass. The correlation increased substantially (r2=0.95), when a measure with linear dimensions of length was defined as the cube root of ID. There is a high degree of correlation between ID-based measures obtained from different views of the same mass. ID-based measures showed a higher degree of invariance than mass diameter or effective size.