An opinion poll was carried out during the ALFEDIAM Congress Bordeaux 2003. One hundred and thirty-seven participants (mean age 43.6 +/- 8.3 years/sex Ratio approximately 1) among whom 22.6% run private practices, 51.8% work in hospitals and 21.3% are both private and hospital practitioners, have been questioned about their conception of the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Prediabetes is an acknowledged entity for 61% of the people surveyed. Two thirds use as a diagnostical criterion, moderate fasting hyperglycemia and/or a impaired glucose tolerance. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is still commonly practised among 51.9% but that is done sparingly only to confirm the diagnosis of diabetes in presence either of several risk factors or of a moderate fasting hyperglycemia. According to 70% of the answers, the detection of diabetes must be repeated every year among at risk subjects aged over 45. The metabolic syndrome is defined according to diverse criteria. The right definition of ATP III is given only in 5% of the cases. As regards the treatment, the combined requirements of physical activity and dietary rules are approved by 97% of the answers. The majority of the persons questioned in the survey consider that a slight loss of weight (less than 5% of the initial weight) is sufficient in a high risk risk individual.On the other hand, opinions are divided as regards the use of drugs at the pre-diabetes stage. Metformin is the only one that is accepted by more than 50% with a rate of 58.4% of positive answers, acarbose and orlistat rating respectively 37.2% and 35%. However a great majority (83.6%) are in favour of the reimbursement of antidiabetic drugs in this indication, for high risk individuals, provided a study has clearly demonstrated the efficiency of the molecule concerned.