Group comparisons of DSM-IV subtypes of chronic depression: validity of the distinctions, part 2

J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Nov;112(4):614-22. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.614.

Abstract

The nosology of chronic depression in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV, American Psychiatric Association, 1994) is highly complex and requires clinicians to differentiate among several chronic course subtypes. This study replicates an earlier investigation (J. McCullough et al., 2000; see record 2000-05424-007) that found few differences among Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.; DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) categories of chronic depression. In the present study, 681 outpatients with chronic major depression, double depression, recurrent major depression without full interepisode recovery, and chronic major depression superimposed on antecedent dysthymia were compared. Few differences were observed on a broad range of demographic, clinical, psychosocial, family history, and treatment response variables. The authors suggest that chronic depression should be viewed as a single, broad condition that can assume a variety of clinical course configurations.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Chronic Disease
  • Comorbidity
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / classification*
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / diagnosis
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / psychology
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders*
  • Dysthymic Disorder / classification*
  • Dysthymic Disorder / diagnosis
  • Dysthymic Disorder / psychology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Personality Assessment / statistics & numerical data
  • Personality Disorders / classification
  • Personality Disorders / diagnosis
  • Personality Disorders / psychology
  • Psychometrics / statistics & numerical data
  • Reproducibility of Results