Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the FREEDOM trial

Circulation. 2013 Feb 19;127(7):820-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.147488. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

Abstract

Background: Studies from the balloon angioplasty and bare metal stent eras have demonstrated that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is cost-effective compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients undergoing multivessel coronary revascularization-particularly among patients with complex coronary artery disease or diabetes mellitus. Whether these results apply in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era is unknown.

Methods and results: Between 2005 and 2010, 1900 patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomized to PCI with DES (DES-PCI; n=953) or CABG (n=947). Costs were assessed from the perspective of the U.S. health care system. Health state utilities were assessed using the EuroQOL 5 dimension 3 level questionnaire. A patient-level microsimulation model based on U.S. life-tables and in-trial results was used to estimate lifetime cost-effectiveness. Although initial procedural costs were lower for CABG, total costs for the index hospitalization were $8622 higher per patient. Over the next 5 years, follow-up costs were higher with PCI, owing to more frequent repeat revascularization and higher outpatient medication costs. Nonetheless, cumulative 5-year costs remained $3641 higher per patient with CABG. Although there were only modest gains in survival with CABG during the trial period, when the in-trial results were extended to a lifetime horizon, CABG was projected to be economically attractive relative to DES-PCI, with substantial gains in both life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios <$10 000 per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained across a broad range of assumptions regarding the effect of CABG on post-trial survival and costs.

Conclusions: Despite higher initial costs, CABG is a highly cost-effective revascularization strategy compared with DES-PCI for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinical-trials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00086450.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Ambulatory Care / economics
  • Ambulatory Care / statistics & numerical data
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / economics*
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / mortality
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / economics*
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / mortality
  • Coronary Artery Disease / economics*
  • Coronary Artery Disease / mortality
  • Coronary Artery Disease / surgery
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / economics
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / mortality
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / economics
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / mortality
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / economics*
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / mortality
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / surgery
  • Diabetic Angiopathies / therapy
  • Drug-Eluting Stents / economics*
  • Drug-Eluting Stents / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hospital Costs / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00086450