Background: Delaying surgery for infants with CDH until they achieve clinical stability is common practice. Stability, however, is inconsistently defined, and many infants fail to reach pre-established criteria. We sought to determine if infants undergoing surgery without meeting pre-established criteria could achieve meaningful survival.
Methods: All infants in the CAPSNet database were analyzed (2005-2010). Patients undergoing operative repair were divided into two groups based on whether they met strict (FiO2<0.40, conventional ventilation, preductal saturation >92%, no inotropes or vasodilators), or lenient (FiO2 <0.60, conventional ventilation, preductal saturation >88%, no vasodilators) criteria. Univariate analyses were performed comparing characteristics of those who survived after surgery (N=273) with those who did not (N=21).
Results: 294 patients (85%) survived to surgery. Predictors of post-operative survival included prenatal liver position (p=0.003), preoperative oxygen requirements (p=0.008), preoperative inotropes (p<0.0001), and non-conventional ventilation (p=0.004). Infants meeting strict criteria had increased survival (99%; p<0.0001). Infants meeting lenient criteria constituted 70% of survivors. Nearly one-third of survivors met neither strict nor lenient criteria.
Conclusions: Infants with CDH can achieve good survival even when criteria for pre-operative stability are not met. We suggest that all infants should be repaired even if lenient criteria for ventilatory, inotrope, or vasodilator requirements are not achieved.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.