Objective: To explore the effects of reconstructing method (narrow gastric tube (NGT) versus whole stomach (WS)) on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients during a 3-year follow-up.
Methods: In a prospective randomized single-center study from 2007 to 2008, 104 patients underwent esophagectomy for cancer. They were divided into NGT (n = 52) and WS (n = 52) groups. To assess HRQL, a questionnaire in references to EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 was administered at 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 3 years post-operation. Their clinical data were collected prospectively and follow-up was performed regularly.
Results: The patients in the NGT group reported significantly (P < 0.05) better average scores of HRQL at both 6 months and 1 year.However, no significant difference in average scores of HRQL was found at 3 years. Patients in the NGT group reported significantly (P < 0.05) better scores of reflux at 3 weeks, 6 months and 1 year.Nausea was the only item with significant difference on HRQL at 2 years and 3 years.No significant difference existed between two groups with regards to cumulative survival rate at 3 years.
Conclusion: No significant difference existed between two groups with regards to cumulative survival rate at 3 years. The patients with gastric tube reconstruction after oncologic esophagectomy present better HRQL.Further studies are warranted to perform survival analysis beyond 3 year post-operation.