Purpose: Few articles have evaluated vertebral artery ostium stents using multislice computed tomography (CT). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 64- and 16-slice CT for detecting significant in-stent restenosis after vertebral artery ostium stenting, and to identify factors affecting the accurate diagnosis by CT.
Methods: We reviewed 57 stents scanned using 64-slice CT and 34 stents using 16-slice CT. The accuracy of CT for diagnosing significant in-stent restenosis (≥ 50% diameter narrowing) was calculated using conventional angiography as a reference standard. Possible factors influencing the diagnostic performance of CT were analyzed, such as CT scanner, image quality, and stent characteristics.
Results: With 64-slice CT, 46 (80.7%) of 57 stents were classified as evaluable, while with 16-slice CT, 28 (82.3%) of 34 stents were classified as evaluable. No stents with diameters ≤ 2.75 mm were evaluable. The respective results for 64- versus 16-slice CT were sensitivity 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.3-99.7%) versus 100% (95% CI 15.8-100.0%), specificity 94.7% (95% CI 82.3%-99.4%) versus 96.2% (95% CI 80.4-99.9%). Factors reducing the accurate diagnosis were those associated with poor image quality, a diameter ≤ 2.75 mm, and drug-eluting stent type (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: 64-slice and 16-slice CT scans are adequate in stents with diameters > 2.75 mm for the evaluation of in-stent restenosis after stent implantation in the vertebral artery ostium.
Keywords: CT angiography; In-stent restenosis; Stent; Vertebral artery.