Characteristics and long-term follow-up of participants with peripheral arterial disease during ALLHAT

J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Nov;29(11):1475-83. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2947-1.

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a major risk factor for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Little is known about relative efficacy of antihypertensive treatments for preventing PAD.

Objectives: To compare, by randomized treatment groups, hospitalized or revascularized PAD rates and subsequent morbidity and mortality among participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lower Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

Design: Randomized, double-blind, active-control trial in high-risk hypertensive participants.

Participants: Eight hundred thirty participants with specified secondary outcome of lower extremity PAD events during the randomized phase of ALLHAT.

Interventions/events: In-trial PAD events were reported during ALLHAT (1994-2002). Post-trial mortality data through 2006 were obtained from administrative databases. Mean follow-up was 8.8 years.

Main measures: Baseline characteristics and intermediate outcomes in three treatment groups, using the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate cumulative event rates and post-PAD mortality rates, Cox proportional hazards regression model for hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals, and multivariate Cox regression models to examine risk differences among treatment groups.

Key results: Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, neither participants assigned to the calcium-channel antagonist amlodipine nor to the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril showed a difference in risk of clinically advanced PAD compared with those in the chlorthalidone arm (HR, 0.86; 95 % CI, 0.72-1.03 and HR, 0.98; 95 % CI, 0.83-1.17, respectively). Of the 830 participants with in-trial PAD events, 63 % died compared to 34 % of those without PAD; there were no significant treatment group differences for subsequent nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularizations, strokes, heart failure, or mortality.

Conclusions: Neither amlodipine nor lisinopril showed superiority over chlorthalidone in reducing clinically advanced PAD risk. These findings reinforce the compelling need for comparative outcome trials examining treatment of PAD in high-risk hypertensive patients. Once PAD develops, cardiovascular event and mortality risk is high, regardless of type of antihypertensive treatment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000542.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Amlodipine / therapeutic use
  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Chlorthalidone / therapeutic use
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / complications
  • Hypertension / drug therapy*
  • Hypertension / mortality
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Lisinopril / therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / etiology
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / mortality
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / prevention & control*
  • United States / epidemiology

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Amlodipine
  • Lisinopril
  • Chlorthalidone

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00000542