In a retrospective study, the clinical usefulness of digital image intensifier radiography was analysed. It could be demonstrated that for angiographic procedures the image quality of a 1024(2) matrix is superior to a 512(2) matrix. For digital excretory urography it could be seen that in 80 to 90% the images were at least sufficient to analyse the renal pelvis. Digital image intensifier radiography of bones was diagnostically sufficient in 76% and analysis of bone architecture was possible in 85%.