Motion mitigation for lung cancer patients treated with active scanning proton therapy

Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2462-9. doi: 10.1118/1.4916662.

Abstract

Purpose: Motion interplay can affect the tumor dose in scanned proton beam therapy. This study assesses the ability of rescanning and gating to mitigate interplay effects during lung treatments.

Methods: The treatments of five lung cancer patients [48 Gy(RBE)/4fx] with varying tumor size (21.1-82.3 cm(3)) and motion amplitude (2.9-30.6 mm) were simulated employing 4D Monte Carlo. The authors investigated two spot sizes (σ ∼ 12 and ∼ 3 mm), three rescanning techniques (layered, volumetric, breath-sampled volumetric) and respiratory gating with a 30% duty cycle.

Results: For 4/5 patients, layered rescanning 6/2 times (for the small/large spot size) maintains equivalent uniform dose within the target >98% for a single fraction. Breath sampling the timing of rescanning is ∼ 2 times more effective than the same number of continuous rescans. Volumetric rescanning is sensitive to synchronization effects, which was observed in 3/5 patients, though not for layered rescanning. For the large spot size, rescanning compared favorably with gating in terms of time requirements, i.e., 2x-rescanning is on average a factor ∼ 2.6 faster than gating for this scenario. For the small spot size however, 6x-rescanning takes on average 65% longer compared to gating. Rescanning has no effect on normal lung V20 and mean lung dose (MLD), though it reduces the maximum lung dose by on average 6.9 ± 2.4/16.7 ± 12.2 Gy(RBE) for the large and small spot sizes, respectively. Gating leads to a similar reduction in maximum dose and additionally reduces V20 and MLD. Breath-sampled rescanning is most successful in reducing the maximum dose to the normal lung.

Conclusions: Both rescanning (2-6 times, depending on the beam size) as well as gating was able to mitigate interplay effects in the target for 4/5 patients studied. Layered rescanning is superior to volumetric rescanning, as the latter suffers from synchronization effects in 3/5 patients studied. Gating minimizes the irradiated volume of normal lung more efficiently, while breath-sampled rescanning is superior in reducing maximum doses to organs at risk.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Cohort Studies
  • Computer Simulation
  • Datasets as Topic
  • Humans
  • Lung / pathology
  • Lung / radiation effects
  • Lung Neoplasms / pathology
  • Lung Neoplasms / radiotherapy*
  • Models, Biological
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Motion*
  • Proton Therapy / methods*
  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Respiration
  • Time Factors
  • Tumor Burden