Posterolateral Lumbar Arthrodesis With and Without Interbody Arthrodesis for L4-L5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Comparative Value Analysis

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jun 15;40(12):917-25. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000856.

Abstract

Study design: Independent retrospective review of prospectively collected data, comparative cohort study.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical, radiographical, and cost/value of the addition of an interbody arthrodesis (IBA) to a posterolateral arthrodesis (PLA) in the surgical treatment of L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The authors hypothesized that the addition of IBA to PLA would produce added value while incurring minimal additional costs.

Summary of background data: Many lumbar surgical advances have been made during the past several decades, yet there is a paucity of strong evidence-based validation, let alone comparative value analyses. The addition of an IBA to a PLA has become increasingly popular during the past 2 decades, yet the potential added value for the patient has not been carefully defined.

Methods: Patients undergoing single-level arthrodesis for L4-L5 DS performed at our institution from 2004 to 2012 were identified. Exclusion criteria included multilevel arthrodesis, spinal stenosis requiring decompression at or above L2-L3, previous L4-L5 spinal fusion, spondylolisthesis of greater than 33% of the vertebral body, and use of minimally invasive surgery. Radiographical fusion status, epidemiological, surgical, and functional outcomes, and cost/value data were recorded or calculated.

Results: A total of 179 patients with follow-up meeting inclusion criteria were identified: 68 with PLA alone and 111 with PLA + IBA. No statistical differences were noted in Oswestry Disability Index, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey scores, fusion rates, or cost/value at 6 months and at more than 3 years despite the PLA cohort being significantly older with more medical comorbidities. When length of stay was normalized across cohorts, the addition of an IBA increased hospital costs ranging from $577 to $5276, but this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: This single-center review of open surgical treatment of L4-L5 DS demonstrated that the addition of IBA to PLA added cost while producing equivalent results in fusion rates, Oswestry Disability Index, and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey scores when compared with PLA alone.

Level of evidence: 3.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Female
  • Georgien
  • Hospital Costs*
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay / economics
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / physiopathology
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / economics
  • Postoperative Complications / therapy
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Radiography
  • Recovery of Function
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spinal Fusion / adverse effects
  • Spinal Fusion / economics*
  • Spinal Fusion / instrumentation
  • Spinal Fusion / methods*
  • Spondylolisthesis / diagnosis
  • Spondylolisthesis / economics*
  • Spondylolisthesis / physiopathology
  • Spondylolisthesis / surgery*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome