Single-agent Taxane Versus Taxane-containing Combination Chemotherapy as Salvage Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):634-641. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.042. Epub 2015 Aug 8.

Abstract

Background: Single-agent taxanes are commonly used as salvage systemic therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC).

Objective: To study the impact of combination chemotherapy delivering a taxane plus other chemotherapeutic agents compared with single-agent taxane as salvage therapy.

Design, setting, and participants: Individual patient-level data from phase 2 trials of salvage systemic therapy were used.

Interventions: Trials evaluating either single agents (paclitaxel or docetaxel) or combination chemotherapy (taxane plus one other chemotherapeutic agent or more) following prior platinum-based therapy were used.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Information regarding the known major baseline prognostic factors was required: time from prior chemotherapy, hemoglobin, performance status, albumin, and liver metastasis status. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of prognostic factors and combination versus single-agent chemotherapy with overall survival (OS).

Results and limitations: Data were available from eight trials including 370 patients; two trials (n=109) evaluated single-agent chemotherapy with docetaxel (n=72) and cremophor-free paclitaxel (n=37), and six trials (n=261) evaluated combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine-paclitaxel (two trials, with n=99 and n=24), paclitaxel-cyclophosphamide (n=32), paclitaxel-ifosfamide-nedaplatin (n=45), docetaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (n=26), and paclitaxel-epirubicin (n=35). On multivariable analysis after adjustment for baseline prognostic factors, combination chemotherapy was independently and significantly associated with improved OS (hazard ratio: 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.82; p=0.001). The retrospective design of this analysis and the trial-eligible population were inherent limitations.

Conclusions: Patients enrolled in trials of combination chemotherapy exhibited improved OS compared with patients enrolled in trials of single-agent chemotherapy as salvage therapy for advanced UC. Prospective randomized trials are required to validate a potential role for rational and tolerable combination chemotherapeutic regimens for the salvage therapy of advanced UC.

Patient summary: This retrospective study suggests that a combination of chemotherapy agents may extend survival compared with single-agent chemotherapy in selected patients with metastatic urothelial cancer progressing after prior chemotherapy.

Keywords: Advanced urothelial carcinoma; Combination; Salvage; Survival; chemotherapy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Carcinoma / drug therapy*
  • Carcinoma / mortality
  • Carcinoma / secondary
  • Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
  • Disease Progression
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Docetaxel
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Paclitaxel / administration & dosage*
  • Paclitaxel / adverse effects
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Salvage Therapy*
  • Taxoids / administration & dosage*
  • Taxoids / adverse effects
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urologic Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Urologic Neoplasms / mortality
  • Urologic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Urothelium / drug effects*
  • Urothelium / pathology

Substances

  • Taxoids
  • Docetaxel
  • Paclitaxel