Validation of MRI Determination of the Penumbra by PET Measurements in Ischemic Stroke

The concept of the ischemic penumbra was formulated on the basis of animal experiments showing functional impairment and electrophysiologic disturbances with decreasing flow to the brain below defined values (the threshold for function) and irreversible tissue damage with blood supply further decreased (the threshold for infarction). The perfusion range between these thresholds was termed the "penumbra," and restitution of flow above the functional threshold was able to reverse the deficits without permanent damage. In further experiments, the dependency of the development of irreversible lesions on the interaction of the severity and the duration of critically reduced blood flow was established, proving that the lower the flow, the shorter the time for efficient reperfusion. As a consequence, infarction develops from the core of ischemia to the areas of less severe hypoperfusion. The translation of this experimental concept as the basis for the efficient treatment of stroke requires noninvasive methods with which regional flow and energy metabolism can be repeatedly investigated to demonstrate penumbra tissue, which can benefit from therapeutic interventions. PET allows the quantification of regional cerebral blood flow, the regional oxygen extraction fraction, and the regional metabolic rate for oxygen. With these variables, clear definitions of irreversible tissue damage and of critically hypoperfused but potentially salvageable tissue (i.e., the penumbra) in stroke patients can be achieved. However, PET is a research tool, and its complex logistics limit clinical routine applications. Perfusion-weighted or diffusion-weighted MRI is a widely applicable clinical tool, and the "mismatch" between perfusion-weighted and diffusion-weighted abnormalities serves as an indicator of the penumbra. However, comparative studies of perfusion-weighted or diffusion-weighted MRI and PET have indicated overestimation of the core of irreversible infarction as well as of the penumbra by the MRI modalities. Some of these discrepancies can be explained by the nonselective application of relative perfusion thresholds, which might be improved by more complex analytic procedures. The heterogeneity of the MRI signatures used for the definition of the mismatch are also responsible for disappointing results in the application of perfusion-weighted or diffusion-weighted MRI to the selection of patients for clinical trials. As long as validation of the mismatch selection paradigm is lacking, the use of this paradigm as a surrogate marker of outcome is limited.