'Bioexit': navigating the policy and regulatory pathways for the biotechnology industry in a post-Brexit landscape

Drug Discov Today. 2018 Jul;23(7):1324-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

Abstract

The withdrawal of the UK from the European Union (EU) is a complicated event. Although implications vary by industry, the biotechnology sector is especially vulnerable to the consequences of Brexit. Accordingly, here we evaluate potential repercussions under four post-Brexit political pathways: European Economic Area (EEA) affiliation (Norwegian Model); negotiated bilateral access (Swiss Model); limited participation in EU Customs Union (Turkish Model); or independence under the World Trade Organization (WTO) designation. We conclude that all four pathways fail to protect the mutually beneficial UK-EU biotechnology relationship and that alternative pathways need to be explored. Accordingly, we outline a suite of policy mechanisms aimed at ensuring continued EU-UK regulatory synergy, with the central aim of ensuring access to biomedical innovations and ensuring patient safety.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biotechnology / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Biotechnology / organization & administration
  • Delivery of Health Care / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Delivery of Health Care / organization & administration
  • Diffusion of Innovation
  • European Union* / organization & administration
  • Health Policy / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Humans
  • Patient Safety / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Policy Making*
  • Politics*
  • Vereinigtes Königreich