[An efficacy and safety study of bifidobacterium tetragenous viable bacteria tablets in the treatment of constipation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus]

Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 1;57(4):252-257. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2018.04.005.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms in diabetes is higher than that of non-diabetes. Thus, the aim of the present study was to observe the efficacy and safety of bifidobacterium tetragenous viable bacteria tablets in the treatment of constipation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group-comparison clinical research. The subjects were randomly divided into study group and control group according to 1∶1 ratio by computer generated random number method. The subjects were either treated with bifidobacterium tetragenous viable bacteria tablets (study group) or placebo (control group) for eight weeks, and they were followed up for four weeks without changing foundation therapy for diabetes. The primary outcome was the change of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs). Results: A total of 234 subjects (the study group:116 cases; the control group: 118 cases) from 7 centers were included in the present study. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. In the study group, the CSBMs at 0, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks were 0.0 (0.0, 1.0) , 1.0 (0.5, 2.0) , 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) , 3.0 (2.0, 3.5) , 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) times per week, respectively, while the CSBMs of the control group at each corresponding weeks were 0.0 (0.0, 1.0) , 1.0 (0.0, 1.5) , 1.0 (0.0, 1.5) , 1.0 (0.0, 2.0) , 1.0 (0.0, 1.5) times per week, respectively. There is significant difference in CSBMs between the two groups (P<0.05). Moreover, after 12 weeks treatment, the CSBMs over spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) ratio in the study group was higher than that in the control group [0.53 (0.40, 0.67) vs 0.33 (0.00,0.50), P=0.048], indicating a more complete evacuation sensation in the study group. More subjects in the study group (66.38%) reached Bristol stool classification of normal criteria than those in the control group (48.31%, P=0.005). There were significantly improvement of bowel function index in the study group [study group 42.7 (33.3, 56.7), control group 60.6 (51.7, 75.7), P<0.000 1]. Furthermore, the symptoms of constipation was improved, and the satisfaction for the treatment was high in the study group. There were no significant differences of the safety indicators between the two groups. Conclusions: Bifidobacterium tetragenous viable bacteria tablets can be used in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and constipation. Compared with placebo, it improves constipation and has no obvious adverse effects.

目的: 观察双歧杆菌四联活菌片对2型糖尿病患者便秘治疗的有效性和安全性。 方法: 本研究为随机、双盲、安慰剂平行对照、多中心临床研究。受试者按计算机产生随机数字法1∶1分为试验组和对照组,分别给予双歧杆菌四联活菌片和安慰剂,治疗8周,随访4周,维持基础治疗不变。观察完全自发排便次数的变化及完全自发排便比例等。 结果: 7个中心共入选234例(试验组116例;对照组118例),基线指标两组差异无统计学意义。完全自发排便次数在0、2、4、8、12周试验组分别为0.0(0.0,1.0)、1.0(0.5,2.0)、2.0(1.0,3.0)、3.0(2.0,3.5)、2.0(1.0,3.0)次/周;对照组分别为0.0(0.0,1.0)、1.0(0.0,1.5)、1.0(0.0,1.5)、1.0(0.0,2.0)、1.0(0.0,1.5)次/周,治疗2周以后两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后12周,试验组完全自发排便比例更高[0.53(0.40,0.67)比0.33(0.00,0.50),P=0.048],排便更完全;布里斯托大便分类正常者比例更高(66.38%比48.31%,P=0.005);肠功能指数改善更显著[42.7(33.3,56.7)比60.0(51.7,75.7),P<0.000 1];改善便秘症状效果更明显;对治疗满意度更高。安全性指标两组差异无统计学意义。 结论: 双歧杆菌四联活菌片用于2型糖尿病合并便秘患者,能改善便秘,安全性好。.

Keywords: Bifidobacterium tetragenous viable bacteria tablets; Constipation; Diabetes mellitus.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Bifidobacterium*
  • Constipation / complications
  • Constipation / therapy*
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / complications*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Feces
  • Humans
  • Tablets / administration & dosage*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Tablets