Greenhouse gas emissions from advanced nitrogen-removal onsite wastewater treatment systems

Bianca N Ross; Brittany V Lancellotti; Elizabeth Q Brannon; George W Loomis; Jose A Amador

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140399

Greenhouse gas emissions from advanced nitrogen-removal onsite wastewater treatment systems

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 1:737:140399. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140399. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

Authors

Bianca N Ross¹, Brittany V Lancellotti², Elizabeth Q Brannon³, George W Loomis⁴, Jose A Amador⁵

Affiliations

¹ Laboratory of Soil Ecology and Microbiology, University of Rhode Island, 1 Greenhouse Rd., Kingston, RI 02881, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
² Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, 81 Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT 05405, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
³ Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute, 417 Main Street, Gloucester, MA 01930, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
⁴ New England Onsite Wastewater Training Center, University of Rhode Island, 102 Coastal Institute, 1 Greenhouse Rd., Kingston, RI 02881, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
⁵ Laboratory of Soil Ecology and Microbiology, University of Rhode Island, 1 Greenhouse Rd., Kingston, RI 02881, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 32783877
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140399

Abstract

Advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) designed to remove nitrogen from residential wastewater play an important role in protecting environmental and public health. Nevertheless, the microbial processes involved in treatment produce greenhouse gases (GHGs) that contribute to global climate change, including CO₂, CH₄, N₂O. We measured GHG emissions from 27 advanced N-removal OWTS in the towns of Jamestown and Charlestown, Rhode Island, USA, and assessed differences in flux based on OWTS technology, home occupancy (year-round vs. seasonal), and zone within the system (oxic vs. anoxic/hypoxic). We also investigated the relationship between flux and wastewater properties. Flux values for CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O ranged from -0.44 to 61.8, -0.0029 to 25.3, and -0.02 to 0.23 μmol GHG m^-2 s^-1, respectively. CO₂ and N₂O flux varied among technologies, whereas occupancy pattern did not significantly impact any GHG fluxes. CO₂ and CH₄ - but not N₂O - flux was significantly higher in the anoxic/hypoxic zone than in the oxic zone. Greenhouse gas fluxes in the oxic zone were not related to any wastewater properties. CO₂ and CH₄ flux from the anoxic/hypoxic zone peaked at ~22-23 °C, and was negatively correlated with dissolved oxygen levels, the latter suggesting that CO₂ and CH₄ flux result primarily from anaerobic respiration. Ammonium concentration and CH₄ flux were positively correlated, likely due to inhibition of CH₄ oxidation by NH₄⁺. N₂O flux in the anoxic/hypoxic zone was not correlated to any wastewater property. We estimate that advanced N-removal OWTS contribute 262 g CO₂ equivalents capita^-1 day^-1, slightly lower than emissions from conventional OWTS. Our results suggest that technology influences CO₂ and N₂O flux and zone influences CO₂ and CH₄ flux, while occupancy pattern does not appear to impact GHG flux. Manipulating wastewater properties, such as temperature and dissolved oxygen, may help mitigate GHG emissions from these systems.

Keywords: Biological nitrogen removal; Carbon dioxide; Greenhouse gases; Methane; Nitrous oxide; Onsite wastewater treatment systems.