The narrative truth about scientific misinformation

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15):e1914085117. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914085117.

Abstract

Science and storytelling mean different things when they speak of truth. This difference leads some to blame storytelling for presenting a distorted view of science and contributing to misinformation. Yet others celebrate storytelling as a way to engage audiences and share accurate scientific information. This review disentangles the complexities of how storytelling intersects with scientific misinformation. Storytelling is the act of sharing a narrative, and science and narrative represent two distinct ways of constructing reality. Where science searches for broad patterns that capture general truths about the world, narratives search for connections through human experience that assign meaning and value to reality. I explore how these contrasting conceptions of truth manifest across different contexts to either promote or counter scientific misinformation. I also identify gaps in the literature and identify promising future areas of research. Even with their differences, the underlying purpose of both science and narrative seeks to make sense of the world and find our place within it. While narrative can indeed lead to scientific misinformation, narrative can also help science counter misinformation by providing meaning to reality that incorporates accurate science knowledge into human experience.

Keywords: education; misinformation; narrative; persuasion; science.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Deception
  • Health Communication / ethics
  • Health Communication / standards
  • Health Communication / trends*
  • Health Education / methods*
  • Health Education / standards
  • Humans
  • Narration*