Systematic use of phenotype evidence in clinical genetic testing reduces the frequency of variants of uncertain significance

Guidelines for variant interpretation include criteria for incorporating phenotype evidence, but this evidence is inconsistently applied. Systematic approaches to using phenotype evidence are needed. We developed a method for curating disease phenotypes as highly or moderately predictive of variant pathogenicity based on the frequency of their association with disease-causing variants. To evaluate this method's accuracy, we retrospectively reviewed variants with clinical classifications that had evolved from uncertain to definitive in genes associated with curated predictive phenotypes. To demonstrate the clinical validity and utility of this approach, we compared variant classifications determined with and without predictive phenotype evidence. The curation method was accurate for 93%-98% of eligible variants. Among variants interpreted using highly predictive phenotype evidence, the percentage classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic was 80%, compared with 46%-54% had the evidence not been used. Positive results among individuals harboring variants with highly predictive phenotype-guided interpretations would have been missed in 25%-37% of diagnostic tests and 39%-50% of carrier screens had other approaches to phenotype evidence been used. In summary, predictive phenotype evidence associated with specific curated genes can be systematically incorporated into variant interpretation to reduce uncertainty and increase the clinical utility of genetic testing.