Comparison of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Adult Patients with Aplastic Anemia

Aplastic anemia patients who are refractory to immunosuppressive therapy or with very low neutrophil counts require allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has been a treatment option when an HLA-matched donor is not available, and HSCT from a related haploidentical donor using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (PTCy-haplo) recently became another important approach. We aimed to compare the outcomes of PTCy-haplo and UCBT in adult patients with aplastic anemia to identify more effective and safer approaches for alternative donor transplantation. Data in a nationwide registry were analyzed retrospectively to assess the outcomes of aplastic anemia patients age ≥16 years who underwent PTCy-haplo or UCBT as their first HSCT between 2016 and 2020. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS) after HSCT. Secondary endpoints included 1-year failure-free survival (FFS), neutrophil and platelet engraftment, and acute and chronic GVHD. Eighty-three patients who underwent PTCy-haplo (n = 24) or UCBT (n = 59) were eligible. The 1-year OS rate was 78.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.7% to 90.5%) in the PTCy-haplo group and 77.5% (95% CI, 64.5% to 86.3%; P = .895) in the UCBT group. The 1-year FFS rate was 78.7% (95% CI, 56.1% to 90.6%) in the PTCy-haplo group and 62.2% (95% CI, 48.5% to 73.3%; P = .212) in the UCBT group. Among patients age <40 years, the PTCy-haplo group had a significantly higher FFS rate (92.9% [95% CI, 59.1% to 99.0%]) vs 63.9% [95% CI, 43.2% to 78.7%]; P = .047). Neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment rates were significantly higher in the PTCy-haplo group compared with the UCBT group: 95.8% (95% CI, 73.9% to 99.4%) vs 78.0% (95% CI, 65.1% to 86.6%, P < .001) and 83.3% (95% CI, 61.5% to 93.4%) vs 72.9% (95% CI, 59.6% to 82.4%; P = .025). No significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD between the 2 groups. Aplastic anemia patients achieved significantly higher neutrophil and platelet engraftment rates with PTCy-haplo than with UCBT. OS and the incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were similar between the 2 groups. In patients age <40 years, the FFS rate was higher in the PTCy-haplo group. PTCy-haplo is promising for alternative donor transplantation in adult patients with aplastic anemia.