Validation of the Canadian Institute for Health Information Diagnostic Codes for Benign Gynaecologic Surgery

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 Jun;46(6):102343. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102343. Epub 2023 Dec 30.

Abstract

We investigated the validity of the 10th Revision Canadian modification of International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems (ICD-10-CA) diagnostic codes for surgery for benign gynaecologic conditions in the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI-DAD), the main source of routinely collected data in Canada. Reabstracted data from patient charts was compared to ICD-10-CA codes and measures of validity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. A total of 1068 procedures were identified. More objective, structural diagnoses (fibroids, prolapse) had higher sensitivity and near-perfect Kappa coefficients, while more subjective, symptomatic diagnoses (abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain) had lower sensitivity and moderate-substantial Kappa coefficients. Specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were generally high for all diagnoses. These findings support the use of CIHI-DAD data for gynaecologic research.

Keywords: abnormal uterine bleeding; chronic pelvic pain; data validation; endometriosis; fibroids; pelvic disease.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Kanada
  • Databases, Factual
  • Female
  • Genital Diseases, Female* / diagnosis
  • Genital Diseases, Female* / surgery
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
  • Humans
  • International Classification of Diseases*