[General practitioners' perspectives on the perceived effectiveness of the disease management programs for type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease: Results of a focus group study]

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Apr:185:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.12.003. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Background: The majority of patients in disease management programs (DMPs) for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in Germany are enrolled by their general practitioner (GP). The aim of this study was, in the context of upcoming DMP expansions, to elicit GPs' current experiences and opinions regarding the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of the DMPs T2DM and CHD, as well as to determine beneficial and hindering aspects of the implementation of these programs from a GP's perspective.

Methods: In August and September 2020, 20 GPs of teaching practices of the University Hospital Cologne with experiences in DMPs were interviewed in semi-structured focus group discussions. Their expectations, attitudes and opinions regarding the DMPs T2DM and CHD were evaluated and analyzed according to the content-structuring qualitative content analysis by Kuckartz.

Results: The DMP T2DM was rated as generally positive by the respondents due to the structured treatment including regular foot and eye examinations, close patient contacts and perceptions of improved health outcomes. The DMP CHD was rated more negatively by the respondents because of a high and partly unnecessary documentation workload and limited therapeutic freedom, leading to a perceived ineffectiveness for patients' health outcomes. Thus, there was a discrepancy in the perceived effectiveness of the examined DMPs, causing a lower acceptance of the DMP CHD. Therefore, some of the respondents tended to enroll fewer patients into the DMP CHD or to drop out of the DMP CHD.

Discussion: In order to increase the acceptance and sustainability of DMPs some elements of the DMP CHD as well as the remuneration and the documentation need to be reconsidered. Additionally, future studies on the acceptance of DMPs should differentiate between different DMPs in order to generate valid results.

Keywords: Coronary heart disease (CHD); Disease Management Programme (DMP); Disease management programs; Hausärztliche Versorgung; Koronare Herzkrankheit (KHK); Primary care; Typ-2-Diabetes mellitus; Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Coronary Disease* / therapy
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / drug therapy
  • Disease Management
  • Focus Groups
  • General Practitioners*
  • Deutschland
  • Humans