Posteroinferior glenosphere positioning is associated with improved range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component and lateralized glenoid

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Oct;33(10):2171-2177. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Mar 25.

Abstract

Background: Optimal glenosphere positioning in a lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to maximize functional outcomes has yet to be clearly defined. Center of rotation (COR) measurements have largely relied on anteroposterior radiographs, which allow assessment of lateralization and inferior position, but ignore scapular Y radiographs, which may provide an assessment of the posterior and inferior position relative to the acromion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the COR in the sagittal plane and assess the effect of glenosphere positioning with functional outcomes using a 135° inlay stem with a lateralized glenoid.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on a prospectively maintained multicenter database on patients who underwent primary RSA from 2015 to 2021 with a 135° inlay stem. The COR was measured on minimum 2-year postoperative sagittal plain radiographs using a best-fit circle fit method. A best-fit circle was made on the glenosphere and the center was marked. From there, 4 measurements were made: (1) center to the inner cortex of the coracoid, (2) center to the inner cortex of the anterior acromion, (3) center to the inner cortex of the middle acromion, and (4) center to the inner cortex of the posterior acromion. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate any association between the position of the COR relative to bony landmarks with functional outcomes.

Results: A total of 136 RSAs met the study criteria. There was no relation with any of the distances with outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, visual analog scale). In regard to range of motion (ROM), each distance had an effect on at least 1 parameter. The COR to coracoid distance had the broadest association with ROM, with improvements in forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER0), and internal rotation with the arm at 90° (IR90) (P < .001, P = .031, and P < .001, respectively). The COR to coracoid distance was also the only distance to affect the final FF and IR90. For every 1-mm increase in this distance, there was a 1.8° increase in FF and 1.5° increase in IR90 (β = 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-2.72, P < .001, and β = 1.53, 95% CI 0.65-2.41, P < .001; respectively).

Conclusion: Evaluation of the COR following RSA in the sagittal plane suggests that a posteroinferior glenosphere position may improve ROM when using a 135° inlay humeral component and a lateralized glenoid.

Keywords: Center of rotation; glenosphere position; outcomes; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; sagittal radiographs; scapular Y.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Humerus / diagnostic imaging
  • Humerus / surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Range of Motion, Articular* / physiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Shoulder Joint* / diagnostic imaging
  • Shoulder Joint* / physiopathology
  • Shoulder Joint* / surgery
  • Shoulder Prosthesis*
  • Treatment Outcome