Meta-analysis: Radial Scar and Breast MRI

Acad Radiol. 2024 Oct;31(10):3910-3916. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.04.007. Epub 2024 May 7.

Abstract

Background: The implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis has increased the detection of radial scar (RS). Managing this finding may be experienced as a clinical dilemma in daily practice. Breast Contrast-Enhanced MRI (CE-BMR) is a known modality in case of problem-solving tool for mammographic abnormalities. However, the data about AD and CE-BMR are scant.

Objective: The purpose was to estimate the benefit of CE-BMR in the setting of RS detected mammographically through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Methods: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were conducted in 2022. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, an analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was the correlation between CE-BMR findings and definite outcome for RS (pure RS versus RS associated with atypia or malignancy).

Results: Three studies were available. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% for each.

Conclusion: The high NPV could allow for deferral of a biopsy in favor of a short-interval imaging follow-up in the setting of a negative CE-BMR.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Breast / diagnostic imaging
  • Breast Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging
  • Cicatrix* / diagnostic imaging
  • Contrast Media*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / methods
  • Mammography / methods

Substances

  • Contrast Media