Evaluation of the utility and cost of secondary confirmatory testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae identification from culture

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jul;109(3):116336. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116336. Epub 2024 May 5.

Abstract

Current guideline recommends the use of two identification methods for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) is now used for primary identification and may be sufficient for definitive identification of N. gonorrhoeae. The performance of three secondary tests (BactiCard, RapID NH and NET test) were compared using 45 bacterial isolates, including 37 Neisseria species. These secondary tests demonstrated diminished specificity (67% - 88%) for N. gonorrhoeae compared with MALDI-TOF. Additionally, data from six clinical microbiology laboratories was used to compare confirmatory test costs and the agreement of results with MALDI-TOF. Discrepancies were documented for 9.4% of isolates, though all isolates (n= 288) identified by MALDI-TOF as N. gonorrhoeae were confirmed by the reference laboratory. These data demonstrate that MALDI-TOF alone is sufficient for N. gonorrhoeae identification, as secondary did not add diagnostic value but do add costs to the testing process.

Keywords: Cost analysis; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Public health; Secondary testing.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Bacteriological Techniques / economics
  • Bacteriological Techniques / methods
  • Gonorrhea* / diagnosis
  • Gonorrhea* / microbiology
  • Humans
  • Neisseria gonorrhoeae* / classification
  • Neisseria gonorrhoeae* / isolation & purification
  • Sensitivity and Specificity*
  • Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization* / economics
  • Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization* / methods