Patient preferences for inflammatory bowel disease treatments: protocol development of a global preference survey using a discrete choice experiment

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 14:11:1418874. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1418874. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: As the therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to expand, a need exists to understand how patients perceive and value different attributes associated with their disease as well as with current and emerging treatments. These insights can inform the development and regulation of effective interventions for IBD, benefiting various stakeholders including healthcare professionals, drug developers, regulators, Health Technology Assessment bodies, payers, and ultimately patients suffering from IBD. In response to this, the present patient preference study was developed with the aim to (1) determine the relative preference weights for IBD treatment and disease related attributes, and (2) explain how preferences may differ across patients with different characteristics (preference heterogeneity).

Methods: The patient preference study (PPS) was developed through an 8-step process, with each step being informed by an advisory board. This process included: (1) stated preference method selection, (2) attribute and level development (including a scoping literature review, focus group discussions, and advisory board meetings), (3) choice task construction, (4) sample size estimation, (5) survey implementation, (6) piloting, (7) translation, and (8) pre-testing. The resulting discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey comprises 14 attributes with between two and five varying levels. Participants will answer 15 DCE questions with a partial profile design, where each of the choice questions encompasses two hypothetical treatment profiles showing four attributes. Additionally, questions about patients' socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as contextual factors are implemented. The survey is available in 15 different languages and aims to minimally recruit 700 patients globally.

Discussion: This protocol gives valuable insights toward preference researchers and decision-makers on how PPS design can be transparently reported, demonstrating solutions to remaining gaps in preference research. Results of the PPS will provide evidence regarding the disease and treatment related characteristics that are most important for IBD patients, and how these may differ across patients with different characteristics. These findings will yield valuable insights applicable to preference research, drug development, regulatory approval, and reimbursement processes, enabling decision making across the medicinal product life cycle that is aligned with the true needs of IBD patients.

Keywords: attributes; discrete choice experiment; drug development; focus group discussions; healthcare decision-making; inflammatory bowel disease; levels; patient preferences.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. ES was supported by an SB PhD fellowship from the Research Foundation Flanders, Belgium [1SE9423N]. JS is a Senior Clinical Investigator of the Research Foundation Flanders, Belgium. BV was supported by the Clinical Research Fund (KOOR) at the University Hospitals Leuven and the Research Council at the KU Leuven. The organizations were not involved in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, and writing the manuscript or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.