Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether and how the aperiodic component in electroencephalograms affects different quantitative processes of steady-state visually evoked potentials and the performance of corresponding brain-computer interfaces.
Methods: We applied the Fitting Oscillations & One-Over-F method to parameterize power spectra as a combination of periodic oscillations and an aperiodic component. Electroencephalographic responses and system performance were measured and compared using four prevailing methods: power spectral density analysis, canonical correlation analysis, filter bank canonical correlation analysis and the state-of-the-art method, task discriminant component analysis.
Results: We found that controlling for the aperiodic component prominently downgraded the performance of brain-computer interfaces measured by canonical correlation analysis (94.9% to 82.8%), filter bank canonical correlation analysis (94.1% to 87.6%), and task discriminant component analysis (96.5% to 70.3%). However, it had almost no effect on that measured by power spectral density analysis (80.4% to 78.7%). This was accompanied by a differential aperiodic impact between power spectral density analysis and the other three methods on the differentiation of the target and non-target stimuli.
Conclusion: The aperiodic component distinctly impacts the quantification of steady-state visually evoked potentials and the performance of corresponding brain-computer interfaces.
Significance: Our work underscores the significance of taking into account the dynamic nature of aperiodic activities in research related to the quantification of steady-state visually evoked potentials. The source code for our approach is available at https://github.com/didi226/scut_ssvep_aperiod.