An Analysis of the Otolaryngology Workforce in Pennsylvania

OTO Open. 2024 Oct 9;8(4):e70026. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70026. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the distribution of otolaryngologists between urban and rural counties in Pennsylvania.

Study design: Retrospective database.

Setting: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) database and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Database.

Methods: The AAO-HNS database (Entnet.org) and the CMS Database were used to identify otolaryngologists, their primary location, and their state of training. The 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes were used to classify metropolitan (codes 1-3) and nonmetropolitan counties (codes 4-9) and determine county populations.

Results: A total of 388 otolaryngologists were identified across 67 Pennsylvania counties (33 metropolitan, 34 nonmetropolitan), 80% of which were male. There were 354 otolaryngologists in metropolitan counties serving 11.2 million people, with an average of 2.4 otolaryngologists per 100,000 people (/100 k). The majority of otolaryngologists (n = 235, 60.6%) are located in counties designated by code 1. There were 34 otolaryngologists in nonmetropolitan counties serving 1.8 million people, with an average of 2.4 otolaryngologists/100 k. Montour County (code 6) is home to a large academic center and accounts for 14/34 otolaryngologists in the nonmetropolitan counties. With the exception of Montour County, the remaining nonmetropolitan counties averaged 1.0 otolaryngologist/100 k. Only 3 metropolitan counties did not have otolaryngologists compared to 19 nonmetropolitan counties without otolaryngologists. Most otolaryngologists received their residency training in Pennsylvania (n = 177). New York (n = 35) and Maryland (n = 24) were the second most common states for training.

Conclusion: There is a lack of otolaryngologists in rural counties of Pennsylvania, except in counties home to large academic centers.

Keywords: geospatial analysis; health care disparities; otolaryngology workforce; rural health.