To provide insight into regulatory decision-making at the time of granting initial orphan designation by the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, we have conducted a retrospective analysis for viral vector-mediated gene therapies in rare non-oncological conditions with respect to the data provided to support the criteria to be met in successful applications. We found that a high proportion of non-clinical in vivo data was used for gene therapies, indicating earlier submissions of products that are at the stage of preclinical research and not in clinical development. Clinical data were submitted in only 13% of the applications, containing preliminary results derived from early-stage clinical trials in few patients. Mouse models were used in the majority of the submissions to generate meaningful non-clinical in vivo data highlighting their utility for proof-of-concept studies, and half of the applications containing non-clinical data generated results based solely on surrogate endpoints. The criterion of significant benefit was applicable in 54% of the submissions, which indicates that sponsors are focusing gene therapy development in areas of high unmet medical need, particularly where there are no authorized medicines available.
Keywords: Gene therapy; advance therapy medicinal products; animal models; clinical data; clinically relevant advantage; medical plausibility; orphan designation; orphan medicinal product; rare conditions; significant benefit.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.