[A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Immune Monotherapy versus Immunotheray Combined with Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients Aged 75 Years and Above with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2024 Sep 20;27(9):665-673. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.101.21.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Background: The malignant tumor that has the highest global morbidity and death rate is lung cancer, which primarily affects the elderly. The therapy landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has transformed with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of immune monotherapy and immunotheray combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC aged 75 years and above.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 111 patients with advanced NSCLC who were at least 75 years old and received treatment at the First or Fifth Medical Centers of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital from January 2018 to October 2022. These patients underwent first-line or second-line treatment, with 70 receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and 41 receiving immunotherapy alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the baseline characteristics of the patients, including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, and the number of treatment lines. The study endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety assessment.

Results: The median OS for the immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group was 27.87 months, and the median PFS was 11.50 months. The median OS for the immune monotherapy group was 34.93 months, and the median PFS was 17.00 months. There were no significant differences in OS (P=0.722) and PFS (P=0.474) between the two groups, but a significant difference was observed in ORR (P=0.025). After PSM matching, each group comprised 27 patients. The median OS for the immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group was 17.70 months, the median PFS was 8.97 months. The median OS for the immune monotherapy group was 17.87 months, and the median PFS was 11.53 months. No significant differences were observed in OS (P=0.635), PFS (P=0.878) and ORR (P=0.097). In terms of safety, the overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) before matching was 62.86% in the immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group, which was higher than 41.46% in the immune monotherapy group (P=0.029), while there was no difference in the incidence of AEs of grade 3 or above between the two groups (P=0.221). After matching, AEs occurred in 17 (62.96%) patients in the immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group and 13 (48.15%) in the immune monotherapy group. There were no significant differences in the overall incidence of AEs (P=0.273) or the incidence of grade 3 or above (P=0.299) between the two groups.

Conclusions: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy does not significantly improve OS or PFS in patients with NSCLC aged 75 years and above when compared to immunotherapy alone, and this conclusion was further validated by the analysis after PSM. The safety assessment suggests that before matching, the incidence of AEs of any grade in the immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group was higher. Still, the two groups had no difference in the incidence of AEs of grade 3 or above. Following matching, the tolerability of the treatment was similar in both groups. According to the safety assessment, the unique circumstances and course of treatment for geriatric patients with advanced NSCLC should be considered.

【中文题目:免疫单药与免疫联合化疗在75岁及以上晚期 非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效与安全性对比】 【中文摘要:背景与目的 肺癌是全球范围内发病率和死亡率最高的恶性肿瘤,且多发生于老年患者,免疫检查点抑制剂(immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICIs)的应用改变了非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)的治疗格局,本研究旨在评估75岁及以上晚期NSCLC患者接受免疫单药与免疫联合化疗治疗的疗效与安全性。方法 本研究采用回顾性分析,纳入2018年1月至2022年10月在解放军总医院第一、第五医学中心接受治疗的111例75岁及以上的晚期NSCLC患者。这些患者接受了一线或二线治疗,其中70例接受免疫联合化疗,41例接受免疫单药治疗。采用倾向性评分匹配(propensity score matching, PSM)法对患者的基线特征进行匹配,包括年龄、东部肿瘤协作组体力状态(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, ECOG PS)评分和治疗线数。研究终点包括客观缓解率(objective response rate, ORR)、无进展生存期(progression-free survival, PFS)、总生存期(overall survival, OS)以及药物的安全性。结果 免疫联合化疗组的中位OS为27.87个月,中位PFS为11.50个月,免疫单药组的中位OS为34.93个月,中位PFS为17.00个月,两者的OS(P=0.722)和PFS(P=0.474)无明显差异,ORR之间可见统计学差异(P=0.025)。PSM匹配后,两组各27例患者,免疫联合化疗组的中位OS为17.70个月,中位PFS为8.97个月;免疫单药组的中位OS为17.87个月,中位PFS为11.53个月,两组间OS(P=0.635)和PFS(P=0.878)均无统计学差异,ORR也未观察到统计学差异(P=0.097)。安全性方面,匹配前免疫联合化疗组总体不良反应(adverse events, AEs)发生率为62.86%,高于免疫单药组的41.46%(P=0.029),而≥3级AEs发生率在两组间无差异(P=0.221)。匹配后,免疫联合化疗组17例(62.96%)患者中有AEs发生,免疫单药组有13例(48.15%),二组不论是总体AEs发生率(P=0.273)还是≥3级AEs发生率(P=0.299)均未见明显差异。结论 在75岁及以上的晚期NSCLC患者中,免疫联合化疗相较于免疫单药治疗,并未提供显著的OS或PFS优势,PSM后的分析进一步验证了这一结论。安全性评估表明,匹配前免疫联合化疗组任意等级AEs的发生率高,但≥3级AEs发生率两组无差异,匹配后两组治疗的耐受性相似。安全性评估提示在为老年晚期NSCLC患者制定治疗方案时,应综合考虑患者的具体情况和治疗风险。 】 【中文关键词:肺肿瘤;老年患者;免疫治疗】.

Keywords: Immunotherapy; Lung neoplasms; The elderly patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / drug therapy
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / immunology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Immunotherapy*
  • Lung Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Lung Neoplasms* / immunology
  • Male
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors