Background: Complex fractures of the trochanteric region, as well as fractures located in the directly subtrochanteric region, are controversially discussed around the world regarding the nail type to be used. A long nail is recommended by manufacturers but requires longer surgical and fluoroscopy times. A possible solution could be a nail with an appropriate length which can be locked in a minimally invasive manner by the main aiming device. We aimed to determine if such a nail model (DCN SL nail, SWEMAC, Linköping, Sweden) offers similar structural stability on biomechanical testing on artificial bone as a standard long nail when used to treat complex trochanteric fractures and compared it to long nails usually used in this setting.
Methods: An osteoporotic bone model was chosen. The Swemac Hansson DCN Nail System was used as osteosynthesis material. Two types of nails were chosen: a superior lock nail which can be implanted with a singular targeting device, and a long nail with distal locking using free-hand technique. AO31A2.2 fractures were simulated in a standardised manner. Axial height of the construct, varus collapse, and rotational deformity directly after nail insertion were simulated. A Universal Testing Machine was used. Measurements were made with a stereo-optic tracking system.
Findings: There was a detectable difference in the axial fracture movement resulting in narrowing of the fracture gap. There was no difference in varus collapse or rotational deformity between the nail variants CONCLUSION: We conclude that there are small differences which are clinically insignificant and that a superior locking nail can safely be used to manage complex trochanteric fractures.
Keywords: AO31A2.2; Biomechanical; Biomechanical study; Cephalomedullary nail; GOM; Gamma nail; Hansson nail; Long nail; Surrogate bone; Trochanteric fracture.
© 2024. The Author(s).